From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#27816: 26.0.50; X protocol error: BadPixmap (invalid Pixmap parameter) on protocol request 55 Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2017 10:54:21 +0200 Message-ID: <5984363D.2010106@gmx.at> References: <83vamg5pu8.fsf@gnu.org> <20170727073827.GA17695@protected.rcdrun.com> <83vamd4x4n.fsf@gnu.org> <20170727193029.GH26109@protected.rcdrun.com> <83lgn93unk.fsf@gnu.org> <20170728212321.GA1358@protected.rcdrun.com> <20170728233123.GA29256@protected.rcdrun.com> <83zibn3gei.fsf@gnu.org> <20170802161229.GA28199@protected.rcdrun.com> <838tj1ztum.fsf@gnu.org> <20170802193158.GB30834@protected.rcdrun.com> <833799z61h.fsf@gnu.org> <5982E700.5010006@gmx.at> <83wp6ky5xn.fsf@gnu.org> <598363C7.5010609@gmx.at> <83mv7gxzwl.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1501836924 6975 195.159.176.226 (4 Aug 2017 08:55:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2017 08:55:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 27816@debbugs.gnu.org, bugs@gnu.support To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 04 10:55:10 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ddYNx-00015u-IT for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 04 Aug 2017 10:55:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47190 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ddYO3-0006dx-NG for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 04 Aug 2017 04:55:15 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52799) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ddYNr-0006XI-BF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Aug 2017 04:55:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ddYNq-0006Pg-OB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Aug 2017 04:55:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:38159) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ddYNq-0006PV-K1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Aug 2017 04:55:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ddYNq-0000me-Cu for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Aug 2017 04:55:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2017 08:55:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 27816 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 27816-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B27816.15018369012995 (code B ref 27816); Fri, 04 Aug 2017 08:55:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 27816) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Aug 2017 08:55:01 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40835 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ddYNp-0000mF-0I for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 04 Aug 2017 04:55:01 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.20]:57781) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ddYNn-0000lr-VW for 27816@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 04 Aug 2017 04:55:00 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([46.125.250.13]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MexlN-1e25X408HR-00OW5d; Fri, 04 Aug 2017 10:54:23 +0200 In-Reply-To: <83mv7gxzwl.fsf@gnu.org> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:QZlR5itiNxbKWswQ6toswpMVPOw9B1UNm4Qy/1eL2wkW30+akZs JZENkb62+JsbwpOpahprG5rMwB+icnqlJoZYprVql8uRKWR87AOcxMdvcs1KjbpeJ8EO4Nj W1I6ST6/NgzOYFoUPsZTrPltNIfJlREhxsm9CR/E8ATdOHiEths5trQdY9c3BIqlH+f+7yE JkbY1chRy0jKkdHCrG6mg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:kxalLl+HM/k=:vTS7NQ+e45bitjfgwVXAOI rDwdUiWyc3b55JL/qRB9oMpAo2HIv+WafJftAH7h7PvYu4E+Qp19OfmzpcWofRsEsVz2MEPzP sYZMdn3FGzks5YWkGvaxDRi2lTOHFl1m85RxqCkVekkT9UDzCvOi5v4Eu1+hf+f+4MxSJhDAe BxKwKg/Hx9Z5bGFfsGq+g7OrbtV2RfhciNcCMZZS/FhCF9MIXVRsDlkllSdlforBMgLGU3Au8 C4HNVFG56umdZOfKlpO86vyq2zs7ek2FKDDnCEBmCh0FYMJWCk49jJlRt4yTvhUwoMpUG4zQe Oz3MQF61JzvoGVxEZfB8zIumV4X8z3MQHcyPHmRHAS/MBRfJdVTcGcgrsMDpClved/5PiefXU kqxbqLAFFcJ0WYvJioG/yEL9pJxVWRU5997CP6tJQ1TsyyhFX4gZXFNscCCxJhu0GUz2TAobA tPrLcFIei+CZpebLrOKMv9QYstiQobzEsHNqTXW0yvu2Yfq3kYiayXvsODjrGb9301SbagekP Co1WWZJUTFcONs5RVbwR4jRLtI5ppWnNtPgdv/inbdvCVAE4VAOikCFEb2xMQriB69bBc8Ygt NmdbA+BB98GqsuYDaNd02ZWS7wwjoItgU4A9LnT+K3EuRyHXMSF4+Ms/RawfdMlkDkM0lzrVr OI2t6P9YeEJm4hUUqubtAhhbl0Rb+muL2QSmDthCkvljjtpHFWPdrdNMhVhp1aul3KEQhZcGU N63Clu8XIsMi9iP565BCU+x2eYhPe0pmfM7cUTRiSDZckMuC3TZ8q7jMTl+nNcMSKaXF+1Um X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:135329 Archived-At: > M-x server-force-delete RET Thanks. > See server.el and the emacsclient sources, I think they are pretty > self explanatory, at least as far as the concept goes. In the light of the present bug: Do you see any conceptual problems starting a GUI emacsclient from a TTY-started server? martin