From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#27357: 26.0.50; Emacs starts fullscreen in Ubuntu 17.04 Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2017 12:11:17 +0200 Message-ID: <59425D45.1010006@gmx.at> References: <594143AB.7040500@gmx.at> <59423E58.8030606@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1497521531 24957 195.159.176.226 (15 Jun 2017 10:12:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2017 10:12:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 27357@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 15 12:12:08 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dLRl1-0006Jz-BO for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 15 Jun 2017 12:12:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53002 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dLRl6-0005Z1-8r for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 15 Jun 2017 06:12:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57294) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dLRkz-0005Yk-UB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Jun 2017 06:12:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dLRkv-0001Jn-Uq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Jun 2017 06:12:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:45868) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dLRkv-0001Jj-QW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Jun 2017 06:12:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dLRkv-0005qb-MD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Jun 2017 06:12:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2017 10:12:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 27357 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 27357-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B27357.149752149522437 (code B ref 27357); Thu, 15 Jun 2017 10:12:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 27357) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Jun 2017 10:11:35 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48545 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dLRkV-0005pp-63 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 15 Jun 2017 06:11:35 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]:62333) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dLRkT-0005pc-Mo for 27357@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 15 Jun 2017 06:11:34 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.168.1.101] ([46.125.250.13]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LikyX-1dyLKc1zq9-00cz8h; Thu, 15 Jun 2017 12:11:27 +0200 In-Reply-To: X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:V9z0eD6XFc/28DEvPJGpwkwqNQY93RzNjuZRfgag+BEQ1y6a8Ei s9ut29q4K8D+coE+5oX35aukRkEjONMQwU8g9psp1z7c2c1pNV6j9stl7yzTjEY+dKkSV5V DtlB04sGpMq9pIezSuF0PqYnp+YzCaaGr1vg9fH/83cN2zISstP7B0J0PjUZlrdG+pVswlx amGlWUsFeoD71KR1p5MiQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:25ecIT8cd4c=:OespzOdEIPT5uNyxLXZyoX O6RFFuEJcT2TrO8SNmuYVz68FvXvSX+BFpA3hH6UcozJEtcr9DBA/unMIU8xweTd0fT2sNC3h nGWp6ZMqsKVBVZByk5GdK3zUIuP2QBHqaNT3ILt3XLSqPa7klwxDE+24G8O+qDZoPfZfs/bwL GqLZhG7eSY6kEV4cFTqWonPmlw6uuq6XjFL4HA2NUthVTMKf5/MtvINijZtKVD+2TgxKygF8m sa7Gy2v+Jj2YfPJ4XlHG0J6pVL+uLxnLODT6xi6KL3UQDlcl1kAPAZKhm9Wava18IE5VDNWhY JERtlEobdd8QhyAO4nTdGovoyCYh3TXpcCo1zDjc2I41Exq7lFIVelfHQm57A5iP9sXGmzqc8 Df/9d6brqebVApRY75SnKpq32Dl1eRV3TlOqOdlecKN6cY5agrfGqDdFxgTmnoE2SRJmuHPYH z1IX3uuGHTZYaLwLuEX48BAvWGMpmCenv/eQWM5vpcK4HdVszUnNXTQCEGaeC0T0jQF5pbdiV 4ZC0RsNLxfrWFx/V8Usx/gJgJxMpyO3983vnUkvSMkJsImStLXcgUTrUodpFsXmH19j80Y9yx fuySQte2c/hyK7Pj8ma2fp018/3MJy/mSqkrsZBzPpSOmn5A3IezFrJsDkB8s1W1zFcVPxTDA pjj6/FTUwjgrwMyKjErDS3dmA9oVUjguZUdoLhyy4A48UoG2c+IWSj6FRCWvw7VgyY9BO//3d aU+QsQlD8ZD8X3bE+P2H2ldNoDXtoHQAMoOcHRPDPcPi8ml9dptxMujz+A9pVTKZrlwV736N X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:133613 Archived-At: > If I say "xterm -geometry 800x700" (which is larger than the screen), > Unity will open the screen in "maximized" mode. Perhaps this means that > Emacs is just miscomputing the size of the frame leading to a > way-too-big window, and then the window manager is snapping it back to > maximized? Precisely what I expected and why I asked you to conduct this experiment. Some window managers do that when mapping a window. To continue the experiment: I suppose that once your frame has become visible, you can make it 800x700 characters large. What happens when you iconify that frame and make it visible again? > So where's the frame size computed, anyway? :-) Who knows? Uusually, I say here that one of Emacs' original sins is to request a frame size based on that frame's default character size. martin