From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#25818: 25.2; frame moved off display does not return (OS X) Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2017 12:30:13 +0200 Message-ID: <59046B35.1010808@gmx.at> References: <58AEA232.4000708@gmx.at> <58B30634.1090904@gmx.at> <58B3DDBA.6060003@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1493461939 7977 195.159.176.226 (29 Apr 2017 10:32:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2017 10:32:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 25818@debbugs.gnu.org, alan@idiocy.org To: "Charles A. Roelli" , Anders Lindgren Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 29 12:32:15 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d4Pfg-0001xU-VE for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 29 Apr 2017 12:32:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40535 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d4Pfm-0000Hx-RH for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 29 Apr 2017 06:32:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48060) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d4Pee-0007sZ-15 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Apr 2017 06:31:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d4PeZ-0005h8-3z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Apr 2017 06:31:08 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:47368) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d4PeZ-0005h2-0R for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Apr 2017 06:31:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d4PeY-0004de-R4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Apr 2017 06:31:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2017 10:31:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 25818 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 25818-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B25818.149346184617782 (code B ref 25818); Sat, 29 Apr 2017 10:31:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 25818) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Apr 2017 10:30:46 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45561 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d4PeI-0004cj-1o for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 29 Apr 2017 06:30:46 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.19]:49195) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d4PeF-0004cB-Vq for 25818@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 29 Apr 2017 06:30:44 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([213.162.68.115]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MY86C-1dZ7nN3U4O-00Us4b; Sat, 29 Apr 2017 12:30:17 +0200 In-Reply-To: X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:WWiGwC8gEdb0HVjA/ZAUfKzEceQIgxBoHGmqIauwOOsor2b5ryc xyjgK9O/25m6lbSTe4hG80cpQNjZ4ARodBmyrmyOpuY6nPtmL3Kkz/2L+PvSMmQO57pKbzw AFB5FBRjvIOQgZE7uZYsTuvDb/zj9GpCTIwOQHN3Z7xSP4py2qxTDpYh8m1iAVM7vEA61lu RtaM1JtqXtZNh9FufiW5g== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:OXYEBYtHpDY=:bLRh9VGShgt+UvvCeaIgiL 9Gt3uCQ9pfrB5eO3CC+LdzWNBiOtnmD74ce/7BfunIQ/IDFfRMQCHBtT/+6PPttafmxscjX2S QHaPiK2Ix2EKTI42A5iFO8bfEnhIgCtVDwJx3Bi/GsFoTSNvkPC20kX6MmjpvSmO1KsFE5gN5 HnpFA46LVkfP+tsSd5cKuCFOK+A8O19Z4bm1qNgqojsSV9uCfuQbBKK8H8V1V4GWtM42wMAnU zF9KIwggIE3DEnKVHUylLKGABrvuFwWsK+3JPBVYBkzffFxriVlUFaaeoIXW4Jfz7dn46NBt2 ACX+cf7+BQQhM1ziW5H8re2vKsKOS0TMmQPtXYZnDVT871xmjCOflSDegdj7Anh5jWlhDkUVi QgHJ22182MJDPkRWYOgH3htNJAYFT/povWKC2ZxdhGIq9PutjKVX6DWgtnCdsEJnXH8O9QN+c N1GH50hlb+SEY9qY7ge5dElvuWXlzDSKYIGM3uCnIdMCZpHC16Hv5/kIVDVDZrsAkXD0AIXJL aAMWaKTpVvCwYWBNjBFZfIbgf5TjgxOuN2N1TqmjSn425FNY8u0WcpS33I/otIB/ne2OyJLMP DdujXMyjNbTMZYuZI3bLRA+ETGFMUQbYF/lg5eSDRfj064ZmybtWzJ0RFUzbBtMnHz2LYFtHh tUL1OBvij9Ux22KlD3oH2n0kKjHOjlFhS2xPTFTteABhFrLEscIVELDXHP24o3o679WIbMnbi Zq8AgZSEvRD1Y9e4j+GEDmfOyeg8o2vsWEw4DE7BF1uKvFJNeIP5/ZhNq7kyKCbG77G8UC6L X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:132098 Archived-At: > I fixed the patch so that child frames are never constrained (after > some testing, it seems that a child frame cannot get stuck off screen > as long as its parent is still visible). To test this out, evaluate > the following from emacs -Q, > > (progn > (setq test-frame (make-frame `((parent-frame . ,(selected-frame))))) > (set-frame-position test-frame 0 500)) > > and drag the parent frame down until its child is off screen. Does this mean that the child frame does _not_ move together with its parent frame? That would constitute a major deviation from the other platforms. martin