From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#25408: Remove Decorations Around Emacs Frame (NS port) Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2017 17:43:57 +0200 Message-ID: <58F4E2BD.3090704@gmx.at> References: <9efbe1e3-e8aa-f056-bc5c-5a41f10b6d42@gmail.com> <58996EED.6030601@gmx.at> <3d34793f-4b7c-d4ea-74ec-49ce84214cc8@gmail.com> <589F1F58.1050807@gmx.at> <20170412173858.GB82486@breton.holly.idiocy.org> <58EE7C4B.90205@gmx.at> <20170412195121.GA95643@breton.holly.idiocy.org> <58EF2462.9010806@gmx.at> <20170415162922.GA47622@breton.holly.idiocy.org> <58F276F4.4030805@gmx.at> <20170417145613.GA78089@breton.holly.idiocy.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1492443910 32611 195.159.176.226 (17 Apr 2017 15:45:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2017 15:45:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Arthur Miller , 25408@debbugs.gnu.org, =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Pit--Claudel , Anders Lindgren To: Alan Third Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 17 17:45:06 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d08pu-0008Lc-1c for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 17:45:06 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37199 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d08q0-0008SC-0q for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 11:45:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36156) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d08pt-0008Qd-Qr for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 11:45:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d08pq-00054F-Of for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 11:45:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:54479) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d08pq-000547-KZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 11:45:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d08pq-0008On-EM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 11:45:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2017 15:45:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 25408 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 25408-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B25408.149244386432225 (code B ref 25408); Mon, 17 Apr 2017 15:45:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 25408) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Apr 2017 15:44:24 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52678 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d08pE-0008Nh-DB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 11:44:24 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]:49637) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d08pB-0008NT-Vf for 25408@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 11:44:22 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([213.162.68.112]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MbrR4-1chvRi1Zqg-00JL82; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 17:44:04 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20170417145613.GA78089@breton.holly.idiocy.org> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:EGP3lmdbGDpsWexEAceXRN8Jfnwzf4LRSyjhCTA4fByMZPMAgYv 2PHcyVbNivuvBPe+h6VnY+smy59dlIbOtUWd1bs19xR8kAOrmzp5F7cspHw4bd3cp1nlxmo Z/u5xmz8xZSR3NM4OZCZfF9/rbjR0h8CPLKioGP8rEsYFjTd7ESgSBFwEz8Rhg7c+T6ZSLq GXO/MYmyt8eIBjz56GBPw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:+q6FxwjE1Tg=:g/4JFqohGBCO1mghDCMfJ5 KWN5ngOqPNNG3fIyMWOXuIDlvGTtopJFQoJW43QOAjPrwFaFNu0CFJly6tj+0neVdkkLoSY+9 EP/VInJLrS5IfJdfp/Yp3c2jv+F3PDim8pqUXLER2q/VVhFvk8vofaYXOZbz0X7af1HYrf9np KTd6gAze659ZQOvIcVWS5MzfpdeSuQ55pV8ZNTYHtJoCam1gxNG/HrqLyiM5V8m54x9a8Wn5X XkUeU2AvlpqNit29LuY/EsyLNnJQVVz2aId4YectEqkp8Iaez1zPavTKAqoaagF/s19hYMBNN B8Wzjf0Eidbv4z0Ba3CCKZbVd2KCt2X7NCPs4+aAfHfJqlK9fR2FGnRp4VrkMDIJq3WI/fwqD Cui9gzgYxVLPbZ2wQVGJx4iYN3sqrMFaDuoA24Ro3w88OZro7oTFvYc14Z56W8kno4UMfrhBF umz7v/fM/bOX1lol3nBQ/6lpeU2yA3NmenTDevBetv+u971VdqQvHGMCns0p0NQBAhupeVbre 90gjAnRJxKufNMU35fO/tmhUAKdQj9iTbxDZ7tufwVaciR/YeL6qBGU0rHvfFCH4QSahP/OPU 0ER7Lp9j5fPNxatOGffLOBYUSiiYguSUhWjlJBcZtObQjoxWHCLqfFZ383gGnqrDdCizdStyX eMd+mt8uhMaskfdofiEWp3atzqO3gBDUNzIjcv50TQWlwLlAExFZvjMpQ18qbn1OIYl//ZjVX 8BHRD+Ruy+FPV9A+XvLl1ExENCGRB8KVmCxyPH74/AYUAe4lohCvMuat74Q7E2suVV1yh0UU X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:131697 Archived-At: Looks good to me. I suppose though this won't work with GNUStep so I can't try it. Two remarks below. > + * Set frame F's `undecorated' parameter. If non-nil, F's window-system > + * window is drawn without decorations, title, minimize/maximize boxes > + * and external borders. I suppose you want to mention the removal of the toolbar here. If so, we'll have to mention that in the manual as well. When you re-add the decorations, does the inner frame move or are the decorations drawn around an unmoved inner frame? > + * A child frame's `left' and `top' parameters specify positions > + * relative to the top-left corner of its parent frame's native > + * rectangle. Does the above hold for NS? Does a (set-frame-position child 0 0) really put child in the upper left corner of its parent? Also we would have to describe the deviant clipping behavior for NS. Many thanks, martin