From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#25408: Remove Decorations Around Emacs Frame (Windows OS) Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 21:13:15 +0200 Message-ID: <58EE7C4B.90205@gmx.at> References: <831swaepnc.fsf@gnu.org> <5875EF34.20507@gmx.at> <9efbe1e3-e8aa-f056-bc5c-5a41f10b6d42@gmail.com> <58996EED.6030601@gmx.at> <3d34793f-4b7c-d4ea-74ec-49ce84214cc8@gmail.com> <589F1F58.1050807@gmx.at> <20170412173858.GB82486@breton.holly.idiocy.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1492024935 23069 195.159.176.226 (12 Apr 2017 19:22:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 19:22:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Arthur Miller , 25408@debbugs.gnu.org, =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Pit--Claudel To: Alan Third Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 12 21:22:11 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cyNqF-0005vK-1A for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 21:22:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45906 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cyNqK-0007zf-Le for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 15:22:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41594) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cyNq1-0007QF-B9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 15:22:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cyNiM-0000MA-Ic for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 15:14:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:46550) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cyNiM-0000M2-En for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 15:14:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cyNiM-0001Zy-A2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 15:14:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 19:14:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 25408 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 25408-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B25408.14920244286042 (code B ref 25408); Wed, 12 Apr 2017 19:14:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 25408) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Apr 2017 19:13:48 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44749 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cyNi7-0001ZN-Qm for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 15:13:47 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.20]:62850) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cyNi6-0001ZA-B5 for 25408@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 15:13:47 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.168.1.101] ([213.162.68.105]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MGEv5-1csYQB0gIp-00FB8u; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 21:13:28 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20170412173858.GB82486@breton.holly.idiocy.org> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:GRxcQHtCUCMU6zPrxZ7J1kxPxtqKeFPjkepl5l7S6CjodXRouXe 5a8jQca5dUvLcaaP7RN+MNYVAjAP6sr5vulOKOGg/blPSr9p5ZAc9c0z8fCvVVX6Fbae88s KhQbA+HGu7cKRjUhSmnffDfxknX62SkBi6+ryySNFnJjVQqC3u6SvyLpfB5W9P8rDjgCWaq xdOtKaCLTLX2hyIc/CKgg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:D4lizfpiDUE=:PhsLiaGJe2r7SztgOfmxd1 U1dkyhNwCAPHSnVVLmaalf2/Jt8Fw5EntTyBat1srHkU+tN0l4M9bR1XWYp3plz8vDGInabb5 YUr1lDuK1LyFMRr1CrNvLl9Px9C+nT1BVbJ12wPbA+49CwUkj9AlGK75dQemlGXBoVL7JvJsJ Izt0hTHi1VC9BKmFVH6coJy+Uqmlfk4NrafboYx1bR0yXZ8rG+Q5jxNkflaucM0op/quQgDXY pVtpeBlDn/DWIcjppzCPlnx5OYBdYUKSOX6WgCSEE/R3IikBf8k7ztIoTo3+fxKWyRka9aypA py+7/oiDuHddnXISYPwlb6XtAm13p3PvlB8Y88820oRgak6oIw0wvlCIx1KBfrZKshmoqaC97 9YR16c6TonUhc4jsGM933dxxhmTzfFaybYOqFgAfYxOcsr8mmR08q1hq7RjMjMSCHKh8k3pGH yH6v5quV+cvZDKPHQuW2Av4sLxKcpxQdyA0QY+2LPtfrWymcavGunGBRQGCbcWjahGZHYJFun bR19Jnt+EjLhWy1dk304HHatl4p/aOQOO+e5Ae1Gi/K9Abxv1stb1/HMe3d4b4tiX3oYf7pkm F1TodzX5zPFXzCRDkUIrO5YIgq449srpYrVm3M/xMeORwKv1XzEKUrswIy++MWjoQp+swdMBT Lpue85sGwbf4U9ZvJBYsx5PSqS2Jdcxrr0ZSARQGa7DTc+Bhv4HC8zEqq2lR6h2H9qlFGReBq HfiYlH6hpkXcmGWtuoWXwBXBgoIPtS87w9RZ8SfmG1q/EraMBO1x/zydN0+8sF/ctZf1z54Z X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:131514 Archived-At: > Should an undecorated frame be resizable? ie. if you run something > like > > (set-frame-size nil 20 20) > > would you expect the frame to resize? Definitively! Undecorated frames should behave like normal frames - just without decorations. > Mine currently resizes if the frame was created with decorations and > they were removed, When can you remove the decorations? Does it flicker when you do that? > but not if it was created without them. I suspect > creating it without decorations is breaking some NS =E2=86=92 Emacs ev= ent > path. Why do you think so? I never looked into the NS event set but I would expect to receive the usual map, focus-in and visibility notifications. Nothing that would allow to derive that the window cannot be resized any more. Can you add the decorations later, resize the frame and remove the decorations afterwards? martin