From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#25943: 21.5 Frame Display Difficulties Date: Sun, 02 Apr 2017 09:55:11 +0200 Message-ID: <58E0AE5F.3070705@gmx.at> References: "<0b9853e8ecbdb18bb1b8c05347371a7e@127.0.0.1>" <58B925A4.4060406@gmx.at> "" <58BA900B.6040708@gmx.at> "<49adf8e1615512ac19189d75b5e04315@127.0.0.1>" <58BE8138.1040607@gmx.at> "<142b4d1d519a6bf87a5fe320d9eeb419@127.0.0.1>" <58C118CA.8020908@gmx.at> <2395d7c6fbe7358c894bc1406ffcbf45@127.0.0.1> <58C3CF94.3080604@gmx.at> <58D38075.2030409@gmx.at> <58DB63ED.8060305@gmx.at> <58DCB3DB.4050804@gmx.at> <18cc26f5bea50ebd503834074ebaa599@127.0.0.1> <58DF5892.3080001@gmx.at> <7ee8200b866d8067514fb8b0bb9e814b@127.0.0.1> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1491119778 8577 195.159.176.226 (2 Apr 2017 07:56:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2017 07:56:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "25943@debbugs.gnu.org" <25943@debbugs.gnu.org> To: david@ngdr.net Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Apr 02 09:56:14 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cuaMt-0001Jo-2w for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 02 Apr 2017 09:56:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54039 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cuaMz-00073m-2v for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 02 Apr 2017 03:56:17 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52298) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cuaMo-00073f-V2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Apr 2017 03:56:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cuaMl-00079a-SC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Apr 2017 03:56:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:58203) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cuaMl-00079M-Ok for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Apr 2017 03:56:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cuaMl-00057j-En for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Apr 2017 03:56:03 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 02 Apr 2017 07:56:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 25943 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 25943-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B25943.149111973119653 (code B ref 25943); Sun, 02 Apr 2017 07:56:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at 25943) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Apr 2017 07:55:31 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56402 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cuaMF-00056v-3o for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 02 Apr 2017 03:55:31 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.21]:65435) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cuaMD-00056h-C4 for 25943@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 02 Apr 2017 03:55:29 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.168.1.102] ([213.162.68.32]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Lomql-1cSgOb3wqp-00grsY; Sun, 02 Apr 2017 09:55:19 +0200 In-Reply-To: <7ee8200b866d8067514fb8b0bb9e814b@127.0.0.1> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:vFcu+ET59GVynpaNYZaTSPCg2wzbhdKBItV7OpjB/1Le8ENd/C9 mdwjxVGikty3OxwSUaIUH9Mnznv3+DpPztP8GC2BqSKw8smsxPRPlaWrAGrewFdKs5i1rsD bJSQz4M0L/7GLY5Tygci4vQlU0z5bB1i2CtZaUZzNEBTiRKoMDvNA0SNBfB3rnfmj1upLw8 ys/1chbw/vACgTdl0OarA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:Fe7u2wNJqlU=:T5cnDvU2RpFzjYejq/V8jY /0rr8QVzNFkfXmVgGZI6Lb5C2JEkfLLtELuUDmeeC/kTxv33EtMcICQA2LlHczQmMlDxiA1pv WbRhxdiEogHtqiYXc3KvqyA6D43zSq/0G6vYofG4nXIn0vFH2PDkpHXVnm5i2v7TcsrAbAQtT Of29ax5Uojhre3ta8P1bWEH9qen1n5MmPPzZlD/AikhgKHrvhV/owVnWNwjm9K3EdTfX9LGyv gJi3Umco8q2ERXiBTJpCGCkSqZf5+vgve/h1w6nV/ovZHjtwUDuO8ESJeI5hLSwrTXLSk4eOg Jj0W6VKaDygke2IxW6yM4U0/K06X4+LSuXKmk82CQHB14JaeO/kN9X50BV4ELQxgPsK50+sWh z/sHQhrF1eJpid+LbDgpcmWgf5UyXL1jbejOgpuO7CAT0fDuoxtZq+/Ormbxp346pQ8cVTV9I tuF/k0hLXAxnYbAn2t/FeI+9SA+JLkTWzTBl+1icvwviRISU7lxEAT1SKfgANk20b1HXwt49U fGUPiBjs14coryAiBrrc4qqyy8Khl7/HQP/aObBy413jc4xqXSImIeGdgjSIe1FNTOltbw13F PC1M2LSpYRp4/G0xSY3qIPOqppNfdVUblwV28i/uEWb4JFXYciN8l4IF29nb1A58shV4iZC77 wgrwcCkptV7L0ImAz3zoxSFbpIXXWkiPO+UMh1cNRgz8wyyXAcqL8s/PPbCew1SZU/lRSIzSm Ua2jzZEt7FJ0G3Vvai6vA3ANPw+ZQmy57PkDIU5bOzGB2UbGWVhPfvb2ToOW/gBUTdilORg+ X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:131207 Archived-At: > I think that I have done what you ask, with both 25.1 and 23.2. However, > none of the listed functions exists on 23.2 Indeed. > 08-19-37: the result of invoking 25.1 with -Q over the network with ssh > > 08-23-08: after loading .emacs > > 08-24-07: after enlarging the frame by clicking on the top right + > > 08-47-05: a new invocation, no -Q > > 09-05-33: the result of invoking 23.2 with -Q over the network with ssh > > 09-06-42: after loading .emacs (the same file as above, not even a copy) > > 09-07-41: after enlarging the frame by clicking on the top right + > > 09-10-06: a new invocation, no -Q I'm not 100% sure whether these results are for the right display/frame. Also I see that you don't have any image support so your tool bars are empty and useless for comparing. Please repeat as follows: (setq frame (make-frame '((tool-bar-lines . 0)))) (list (display-monitor-attributes-list frame) (frame-geometry frame) (frame-edges frame 'outer-edges) (frame-edges frame 'native-edges) (frame-edges frame 'internal-edges)) Then please run the function (window--dump-frame frame) and obtain the dump from the buffer *window-frame-dump*. I'm only interested in emacs -Q runs for Emacs 25.2 so please do not load your .emacs and always stay in Lisp interaction mode. I need two runs of the above - a first one right after your created the frame and a second one after you maximized it. Also please yank the results into the mail body, it's hard for me to decipher them from the png images. What I did note from your images is that your 23.2 build (I suppose it's the one you always referred to in our past discussions) is not a GTK build but one without toolkit support. So it seems that we've been always comparing apples and oranges and I'm quite confident that if your 23.2 build had been a GTK one you would've experienced exactly the same problems then as you do now with the 25.2 build. However, the fact that maximizing is not propagated correctly to the frame's windows for the 25.2 version must be investigated. Maybe the frame dump will help. How do you maximize? Does any of the following produce better frames? (set-frame-parameter frame 'fullscreen 'maximized) (set-frame-parameter frame 'fullscreen 'fullboth) (set-frame-parameter frame 'fullscreen 'fullheight) (set-frame-parameter frame 'fullscreen 'fullwidth) Thanks for your efforts, martin