From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Drew Adams" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#10134: 24.0.91; Typo, (elisp) `Text from Minibuffer' Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2011 09:17:58 -0800 Message-ID: <58DC9697D3AE4E1593894000B83A9546@us.oracle.com> References: <5C29B1E5472E46FAAEFDB5EBC428EEAA@us.oracle.com> <83ipl6xm9l.fsf@gnu.org> <4AF21D0D66ED4656B010AE8EBA67C186@us.oracle.com> <831urtykqf.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1324747132 12725 80.91.229.12 (24 Dec 2011 17:18:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2011 17:18:52 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 10134@debbugs.gnu.org To: "'Eli Zaretskii'" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 24 18:18:48 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ReVF7-00024V-Oe for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 24 Dec 2011 18:18:45 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39615 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ReVF7-0005yl-1G for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 24 Dec 2011 12:18:45 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:49738) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ReVF4-0005w8-5N for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Dec 2011 12:18:43 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ReVF2-0000Ml-3a for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Dec 2011 12:18:42 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:51240) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ReVF2-0000Mh-0p for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Dec 2011 12:18:40 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ReVHJ-00081z-PJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Dec 2011 12:21:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: "Drew Adams" Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2011 17:21:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10134 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: unreproducible Original-Received: via spool by 10134-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10134.132474725230854 (code B ref 10134); Sat, 24 Dec 2011 17:21:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10134) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Dec 2011 17:20:52 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ReVH9-00081a-O8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 24 Dec 2011 12:20:52 -0500 Original-Received: from rcsinet15.oracle.com ([148.87.113.117]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ReVH6-00081S-Q6 for 10134@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 24 Dec 2011 12:20:50 -0500 Original-Received: from ucsinet22.oracle.com (ucsinet22.oracle.com [156.151.31.94]) by rcsinet15.oracle.com (Switch-3.4.4/Switch-3.4.4) with ESMTP id pBOHI6We000774 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Sat, 24 Dec 2011 17:18:09 GMT Original-Received: from acsmt356.oracle.com (acsmt356.oracle.com [141.146.40.156]) by ucsinet22.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pBOHI5JF026192 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 24 Dec 2011 17:18:06 GMT Original-Received: from abhmt108.oracle.com (abhmt108.oracle.com [141.146.116.60]) by acsmt356.oracle.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id pBOHI48Y009707; Sat, 24 Dec 2011 11:18:04 -0600 Original-Received: from dradamslap1 (/10.159.54.110) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Sat, 24 Dec 2011 09:18:04 -0800 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: <831urtykqf.fsf@gnu.org> Thread-Index: AczCXKzfw6EevcuES3KTwgnoUPoY+AAAXJ5Q X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 X-Source-IP: ucsinet22.oracle.com [156.151.31.94] X-CT-RefId: str=0001.0A090207.4EF60960.0059,ss=1,re=0.000,fgs=0 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2011 12:21:01 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:55163 Archived-At: > tags 10134 unreproducible > quit > > > Yes, `emacs -Q'. Recipe: go to the node; look at it. > > See attached screenshot. > > Sorry, not reproducible. See the attached screenshot. It's probably > something specific to that system's setup, although I'm puzzled what > kind of setup can have such a profound effect on the Emacs display. Dunno what you mean by "that system's setup". Are you referring to the system used to build Emacs or the system where I invoke `emacs -Q'? Did you actually try it using the cited Emacs version/build? It is the latest Windows binary made available on emacs-devel. It is simple to download it and test with `emacs -Q'. In GNU Emacs 24.0.92.1 (i386-mingw-nt5.1.2600) of 2011-12-06 on MARVIN Windowing system distributor `Microsoft Corp.', version 5.1.2600 configured using `configure --with-gcc (4.6) --no-opt --cflags -ID:/devel/emacs/libs/libXpm-3.5.8/include -ID:/devel/emacs/libs/libXpm-3.5.8/src -ID:/devel/emacs/libs/libpng-dev_1.4.3-1/include -ID:/devel/emacs/libs/zlib-dev_1.2.5-2/include -ID:/devel/emacs/libs/giflib-4.1.4-1/include -ID:/devel/emacs/libs/jpeg-6b-4/include -ID:/devel/emacs/libs/tiff-3.8.2-1/include -ID:/devel/emacs/libs/gnutls-2.10.1/include --ldflags -LD:/devel/emacs/libs/gnutls-2.10.1/lib' This is the build zip: http://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/emacs/windows/emacs-20111206-r106632-bin-i386.zip This is the announcement post to emacs-devel@gnu.org: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2011-12/msg00142.html It is 100% reproducible with that build. If the bug has been fixed since then, fine. But please try to reproduce it using the build cited in the bug report. Do that, and my guess is you will have no problem at all seeing it. If you test only with the pretest or the latest trunk then you are probably not testing with the same Emacs sources, let alone the same binary build.