From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#25851: 25.2; GTK warning when starting Emacs when desktop file has more than one frame Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2017 09:29:31 +0100 Message-ID: <58B6866B.2040307@gmx.at> References: <87a89c51qb.fsf@moondust.localdomain> <831suoub86.fsf@gnu.org> <87lgswmi6a.fsf@moondust.localdomain> <83vas0rozb.fsf@gnu.org> <87k28fso3o.fsf@moondust.localdomain> <83o9xrsmrd.fsf@gnu.org> <874lzjsh8t.fsf@moondust.localdomain> <87y3wvqqos.fsf@moondust.localdomain> <83fuj2smzr.fsf@gnu.org> <87wpccmv71.fsf@moondust.localdomain> <87d1e4mq48.fsf@moondust.localdomain> <83innvppz4.fsf@gnu.org> <58B546EE.2030500@gmx.at> <831suipb3r.fsf@gnu.org> <58B5C4A1.6050601@gmx.at> <83shmyno97.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1488357026 8777 195.159.176.226 (1 Mar 2017 08:30:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 08:30:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: nljlistbox2@gmail.com, 25851@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 01 09:30:15 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cizeF-00015h-Tp for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 01 Mar 2017 09:30:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39060 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cizeL-0000ui-Uh for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 01 Mar 2017 03:30:17 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33774) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cizeC-0000qN-Ih for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Mar 2017 03:30:09 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cize7-0000Da-K1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Mar 2017 03:30:08 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:34493) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cize7-0000DH-Fv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Mar 2017 03:30:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cize7-0006ls-9c for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Mar 2017 03:30:03 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2017 08:30:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 25851 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 25851-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B25851.148835699025979 (code B ref 25851); Wed, 01 Mar 2017 08:30:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at 25851) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Mar 2017 08:29:50 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60925 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cizdu-0006kx-8Q for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Mar 2017 03:29:50 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.19]:50723) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cizds-0006kj-Jh for 25851@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Mar 2017 03:29:49 -0500 Original-Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([213.162.68.90]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M5dMm-1cP9TB1ggC-00xdop; Wed, 01 Mar 2017 09:29:41 +0100 In-Reply-To: <83shmyno97.fsf@gnu.org> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:nzrvPEAYNLb7RxXZkq0CJDjJo9Oh6iIRmfWzNTxbXr2Oj3qk+Ib 6L814A9xHhmpKLGFXzS7nATL2QRac6yPc/JuV5MAu05ppmsn/qrJTB9OvGwPNKjMvu+x18u /XMnsAc2mo1wRFqulSgxplVs0FFZnXh3iCtQ1/XUELXsrnGPRrcSyhffQBSsiiaBsYVhVdB 3Do90o++EGbopRifYZXVA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:L9z8BJgmOjs=:PSwtUrsUh5WmMCKlHWJj4B 1jiKYBQ1DfUqyQiD2NifjOHMJc4cLHkj9OG5/J+DJPlMbU3LWF1KJ3umhNGhZkGqj2b6Nw79K RcxaHbYfx1NxoVVBGCXPBIgTUXnam+vxUkXdDM6OYdLPRoaT/kU2WF+dsjxWcNA3jxvDz6Q7f ZJXfF2SlkcX9rT2Rwgqgwus2Yz/r+/qMxYteKiIQQveOuUXtPfqbgo9diif0337yWqti02Khi 3IJcWpHdhJhzvu/D8+X2Gt1fsoyJrJIBZ1J0eXb8R899td03223B0Va1G5eT2W6OaKdxkmOnn WvlVhUoGLnVYJ0G4RxlZM0gNselI9U9BxjxWx9Kr43QNLvC3QfY5zABtDPdJz3Dj7n1Wn6/qy 5gJPT0C4i7bid48IHxx0wXhjjx1kgJ4k9gpNvxwKROj5Yd+Ra2TgyXbhBqbBSrzbZ6SzZA4SI iRiXqZIoFGyxrBRJ/PjOw8t7vhExBrLNmenGCvGOleRaq18saCRyFk2DKJlZJZC/OZF8nhwWs 3HnpZKfDHQjcvvsSFC2tOYllFTbJqtzg56hkvbOwWhsgnZ+G6/rqx3iK1cVAbAhwBjmgoqHog SvG54CFvVv0K/OP2zN92uNBvI5UeUIbous2ehWWXiIu/CTKYydRFUieAm1xhQpNF8rj3DtHb0 5L4fGf+m0HRPGQE2CfxfadFkKPj0T4bPAHP8xF9c41Hz8EUd+kN7S+yX496Srv16cXCY3aeSN 4h2DebPErIkP5YxquKBB2vYP8bhjfgn3HHzPB5XvMDjqfodeeMbanSRTqyFtlqQH6e+I8ZVG X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:129980 Archived-At: >> IIUC we do all this trickery to make a new frame with the left or >> top edge off-screen. > > Do we understand the purpose of this? The purpose of what? If you asked why people want to show a frame with the top or left edge off-screen, then the major goup of clients might be those who want to move the titlebar out of view. Nothing against the use of (make-frame '((left . (+ -100)))) as long as it's done within .emacs. It's a pain, however, when such idioms get distributed in packages because then their authors will redirect users to this list whenever a window manager refuses to comply. martin