From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#25818: 25.2; frame moved off display does not return (OS X) Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2017 17:45:40 +0100 Message-ID: <58B30634.1090904@gmx.at> References: <58AEA232.4000708@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1488127632 4650 195.159.176.226 (26 Feb 2017 16:47:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2017 16:47:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 25818@debbugs.gnu.org To: "Charles A. Roelli" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 26 17:47:07 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ci1yU-0000dK-As for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 26 Feb 2017 17:47:06 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47481 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ci1ya-0000kX-1Z for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 26 Feb 2017 11:47:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46045) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ci1yT-0000jq-SQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Feb 2017 11:47:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ci1yQ-0005b3-Pf for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Feb 2017 11:47:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:58773) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ci1yQ-0005ax-Li for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Feb 2017 11:47:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ci1yQ-0006Jb-DX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Feb 2017 11:47:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2017 16:47:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 25818 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 25818-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B25818.148812756224181 (code B ref 25818); Sun, 26 Feb 2017 16:47:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 25818) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Feb 2017 16:46:02 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56969 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ci1xS-0006Hg-4R for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 26 Feb 2017 11:46:02 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.20]:62637) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ci1xP-0006HA-TM for 25818@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 26 Feb 2017 11:46:00 -0500 Original-Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([213.162.68.101]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LcEPJ-1c11l12TgL-00jdPM; Sun, 26 Feb 2017 17:45:46 +0100 In-Reply-To: X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:hpkyyVNFkaZ1OFEDbVld2qoi8o7PYrAtrTja82vGYRHKMeJE4GN 4/cKZHjASZ3erhrSvotzDtibC5v5e0XDJnULtE+fNtz0gU/tstnDYabUzfLJMKhzeE15tg9 doAWkPVd4c8gYImo/IO0aslIkgh9qnfkC3LEd51Oo2FnUk/jnLBudR6pjbt2qAsbZAqzyL/ wzILXPlNr9jEVdEEDxSfA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:MCsjbfp2YsQ=:0SuUQYnp2C74M1hvaD0SZ/ 5IfWAVqhrW22qRLV1kR3bywZi+BldxawEB979sLyKJdotOIdkjStbjtSCX2eoJ4VkO+Cti3pv k1WuBlaKcj6zfxIYiQ7KK+nD2+a1SZwqCZHtGmu+n/ibl1nw3UxHChArlB+izwuvG3zq0zTEK crDJrdSFnCIMYePFRv1Ng5hxett7JGbGrPzftJ7C52VSONq+dENvB0EpknOpcRGOiDZQqBuFJ ut37KVj8wvV37j5njYguGWHr6qrGb1/zW5Elqq8IgLGuEmmruGqAbNdUSrrQL1IEAyOWoI1kH ejJA9ioc6imYZnVBE35EyoRUQLaDpC1dWGAy1uBO4YajhRyzwLCBaa7c4R98E0/8qlP+fS95Q zRyr8fn2C0uLBQtABf1NdB9oyi/yANvWfXvCtOy503aRXMo6ekDrno1BUzD6pOp3CdOGbdiIO B9lKOMglFzyEVcDrRFyydMJIGjVf+YXgkUZ2kBVqpS912Svy+PClpr7+uXFMc3SdEqgTRSyyV JirgvE/1d/R18V5lVsqNYWQL3fZuF0pxwj7uU/NI0tXJUTg+fMuGpQOiR60dg9nUjLmmAh6OC o/FhsG2x8Y80bUz/rloeBA6PiJlrrvHdojD0Tykfl+2b31YxnQ5yNm+b5DLOCwuHECPN5tbRI TXZnLCOf0ctJ6FjXliuAurG5KpMiiOBkLqO5ttQuovCI3ODJkmFDFLCgxtboCJq1918dvW6fL uHuGGv1nXrpsOJBwy3F5MbHFBUA4mBlf9sdosf7JCC33H1VR0/2/HkbXg1hf8nxarmSwnE5+ X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:129828 Archived-At: >> See also https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D18801. It's= >> possible that the problem was introduced from 24.3 to 24.4. > > I built 24.3 and 24.4 from source, and it is correct that a regression= > with Emacs' handling of the window system in OS X happened between tho= se > two releases. > > The form I suggested to show the issue, [...] > works correctly on 24.3 but not on 24.4 (24.4 has the same behavior as= > 25.1 and 25.2, detailed in my first message). I guess the regression > would be in src/nsterm.m, or maybe src/nsfns.m. So something seems to have happened that Emacs fell into the same trap as other applications (which, in my understanding, is that the frame gets displayed on another, probably non-existent, monitor). I'm afraid that my only suggestion is to bisect the sources until you've found the culprit. (I suppose you verified that the value returned by =E2=80=98display-pixel= -width=E2=80=99 is the same in 24.3 and 24.4.) martin