From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#25818: 25.2; frame moved off display does not return (OS X) Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 09:49:54 +0100 Message-ID: <58AEA232.4000708@gmx.at> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1487839872 20901 195.159.176.226 (23 Feb 2017 08:51:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 08:51:12 +0000 (UTC) To: "Charles A. Roelli" , 25818@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 23 09:51:07 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cgp7C-0004wP-TC for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 09:51:07 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57285 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cgp7I-0005P0-K6 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 03:51:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45392) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cgp7D-0005Ou-DF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 03:51:08 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cgp78-0004nF-SE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 03:51:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:53750) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cgp78-0004nA-OR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 03:51:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cgp78-0007pu-DR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 03:51:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 08:51:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 25818 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 25818-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B25818.148783982430073 (code B ref 25818); Thu, 23 Feb 2017 08:51:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 25818) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Feb 2017 08:50:24 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51949 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cgp6V-0007oy-SH for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 03:50:24 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.15]:53813) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cgp6U-0007ol-9N for 25818@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 03:50:22 -0500 Original-Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([213.162.68.87]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Lxgt9-1cIGv71ch1-017EPu; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 09:50:06 +0100 In-Reply-To: X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:LZyb5i4w2pe7CP/7r+kkxSM4dRzS6jVQUM3pfF80OvotpmkPvsN D9vl0uJ6uVBVd4Z7Ou5QujyoVxuUzPbcQnisz3MiCv1McT7QAjzobMYZYYbhTdWTrRRWguk 6auVCvx7keIWN+Gw5ekvOpOklMElu2sThmA4N3jRT3s8OUajm/NF+9GfttCETOriqOZgjyw AijH8SCo2qFr1OIKjFgvg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:YIw+A06APwE=:LV4Nw7bpUj+OYk64SwPUUx QpouEv5lNw+v5ujRhYrcdMkrP3rc1ON8g7FB/HlltYXcegUXNO4J2pz8ZVdCZw74n+g2FCfvH MiVXlaNBNZKt0TUYWaZ+6Qp/QvYUNFDKWGfwQ3UE41Bgsi/XPs82Bg5L/EXT//NBGF0JWZQcN 4GInRZn0GChAHH3cGmiizoOkGOeS/7KzGPtY9xQfqBvVJoqooZh7+SWEl4jgRz+ry875fOCBF g3eER5L8nxAXg4qKPuXL9/Pu4wds8RwIEZSr2l1k1Mp//2HuhStgZvdSNXRgxnrR3Xt2oTjg3 WXALHET9Ma/4MI/lowHXqyOo4e1sFMBRGAr4lkD52MLG7td8/53TZJ3yJAm1ym9bEapuaJ2g9 tVPXnixfMlF9EwKvmgFaM+NzOnRaZyx4mkWEEF0+4FQ8eYIO+bwftF8TlCDmXJnVvfPlC21jR L6NGvN9FFLbOU9UCTINpcxNkS7XBgZTTWtP66JaeKiTSdIfFRsdML48yn4IxHchWU+SJPGZIq 0H83UoycsAezzHskr6alvoL5Ey6kCo4IMaazmridU+kvdrWXm3H3mRcGRr07VC6p/8pAti4pH EvgrDQYsEClIU6ZNzA3/ES5XQrDAmVbfNqvlSYeLID+ctuX1WkcnL0Sj0ox8QVOvQcECpPu9z oY5aGane8I1w01GFldLp6bI04LrV8RVhNk3rjFz5yq9VT/9a1zfbPaYFFIaKQL26HrhsrC1um YkKz+vSafDQXSCxXj0oEn75iYRJRjX+cnbPTy+TXZqcvfk1nyc9CO1jxt1Xc5XV0wRXWNt9b X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:129684 Archived-At: > You can evaluate this code from emacs -Q to have a frame gradually moved > in steps of 200 px from position ((top . 1) (left . 1)) until it's just > past the right edge of the display (more or less), and then come back > again: ... > On GNU/Linux and MS Windows the frame behaves as expected: when the > frame parameters are changed to bring it back onscreen (step 2), the > frame becomes visible again. On OS X 10.6 the frame stays off screen, > however, and I can't find any way to put it back on screen. You can > change the frame parameters for `top' and `left', and they'll stick, but > they don't actually seem to have any effect. > > Can someone reproduce this on a more recent OS X? Maybe the problem is > fixed in newer versions. FWIW this seems OS X specific behavior. Compare http://superuser.com/questions/55341/move-an-off-screen-window-back-on-screen-on-mac-os-x http://osxdaily.com/2013/08/14/move-window-back-on-screen-mac-os-x/ http://www.gottabemobile.com/how-to-move-an-os-x-window-thats-stuck-off-screen/ http://apple.stackexchange.com/questions/709/how-to-retrieve-windows-that-have-moved-off-screen https://www.cnet.com/forums/discussions/bring-misplaced-off-screen-applications-back-to-your-desktop-380285/ martin