From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#25380: 25.1; save-window-excursion problem in batch mode Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2017 10:39:36 +0100 Message-ID: <58735A58.80801@gmx.at> References: <7qwpe5xusr.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1483954828 18328 195.159.176.226 (9 Jan 2017 09:40:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2017 09:40:28 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 25380@debbugs.gnu.org To: Glenn Morris , Philipp Stephani Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 09 10:40:20 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cQWR0-0002QX-T0 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2017 10:40:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38013 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cQWR1-0001oQ-R1 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2017 04:40:11 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57359) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cQWQw-0001mn-2K for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2017 04:40:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cQWQs-0002vg-4i for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2017 04:40:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:60221) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cQWQs-0002vA-2X for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2017 04:40:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cQWQr-0002F7-Pd for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2017 04:40:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2017 09:40:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 25380 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 25380-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B25380.14839547888589 (code B ref 25380); Mon, 09 Jan 2017 09:40:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 25380) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Jan 2017 09:39:48 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47387 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cQWQd-0002ET-W6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2017 04:39:48 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.21]:64649) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cQWQc-0002EG-FA for 25380@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2017 04:39:47 -0500 Original-Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([212.95.7.106]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MVZuV-1by8qW1UCd-00Z2Vg; Mon, 09 Jan 2017 10:39:35 +0100 In-Reply-To: <7qwpe5xusr.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:y4OR9uuYsPr4KS1dajQWBbdN8pYDppHET7SIO06yg7P6mxnn5uc psOE0eTf7wCnSFR++H1r0JpleiQkYbNpfos/jqv5EG5OD6CnvQT4rxny/8fUNg0GW+p6MFo D/HLq+BZ1Vi8x8wjPq43GkSN/FJR7lhNnI9Q4eQxCRFJ1HCv1DVgwzkOGOwlwUKvB7UHRP+ hSkgP+gJMUnqwIy8bp96w== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:cP9SCDHyIqc=:EV3doQtbSI8KP2aEIckOAN DAoQjdv9y5ZghwlyHYMWNgsuL+7aasXg7Ii72zocO8mjc6ozs5Z5sS6pOeDpon3kJXUFlSceC cRqgWiSEgdhvuxZiD9yvD0IIA6cWyzIWre3xrYij+CyefBtlz4lU+9XNKs+vmg/kUppAOYSOO 9MNipb5/Ftq+dspdkUpMeichWdxz97wclkTVAvZieIHuNuuWqKYME4p+Xg6BcEgb3RkwcM1RI CE8f5buh5e4a5BfsN4fSQRF4+TMMlGaFujuExyWW8YVDqEOBauKLyyMrvASXd9M1ZEgEQBWeb fYsSGLPjJHhvcxANrC7tuy+RFCcZtlzeZTqO7asKYoL5c9obGTHccZLKnX6YcNtTCHW4/CJw2 NNxVLEgEqaLFwIWPohVJu59AfL86D1PdUMcI01sqfyJ4wX6upYavEuj7yNukzmbHOnpMnKENg 6rMT9fQvwDS1huj7iM6z1HFMWeOUs6yQYCaYZNGpxtgfcxYqhIfaUm85ob55aHx8/bU3+3fSS HF59H8SfQkSssYTPVdoR4kn6TysV5TOBdVFIP4H7Zo4oaJtVteZ19IhMhYgt7IYAx7ygDdPs5 L7jR63iYuIKcqkUuxdRZHkhm/XM3lEluph0Dg0ZV800Xag0BxrSrKc46Ck6h40Tn1zsd+xL5j 0R16RZ0Ose1VT3RNPaCtjybENrqBf63ijyfKi9a9AlCy2BPR3GaZRC3ZtaeqwY3QqNee1zMz2 xRmfYogvbxWmOje046FsOFaFmtw+/HqPI7z7wPbkFH5pi7enURrk9GeQZ/WBsk4EGXyzau3e X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:127927 Archived-At: >> Apparently, restoring a window configuration doesn't result in the sa= me >> window configuration in batch mode: >> >> $ emacs -Q -batch -eval '(print (equal (save-window-excursion (curren= t-window-configuration)) (current-window-configuration)))' >> >> nil > > It works in 24.5 and earlier. Something to do with window-edges? > > emacs -Q -batch --eval '(progn (setq c (current-window-configuration))= > (print (window-edges)) > (set-window-configuration c) > (print (window-edges)))' > > 24.5: > (0 1 10 9) > (0 1 10 9) > > 25.1: > (0 0 10 9) > (0 1 10 10) IIUC the pixel comes from a menubar line which gets spuriously added. If someone told me how to debug this, I might be able to tell more. I have no idea how the frame seen by =E2=80=98current-window-configuration=E2= =80=99 gets created in batch mode. I never use batch mode. martin