From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#24583: Xpra compatibility Date: Sun, 02 Oct 2016 11:26:39 +0200 Message-ID: <57F0D2CF.5080702@gmx.at> References: <57F00546.5000007@gmx.at> <57F0C565.6070209@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1475400461 6388 195.159.176.226 (2 Oct 2016 09:27:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 2 Oct 2016 09:27:41 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 24583@debbugs.gnu.org To: "Eugene J." Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 02 11:27:35 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bqd3E-0006zf-IQ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 02 Oct 2016 11:27:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58691 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bqd3C-0000Tw-RH for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 02 Oct 2016 05:27:14 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48049) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bqd36-0000SI-TY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Oct 2016 05:27:09 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bqd30-0005Zl-TM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Oct 2016 05:27:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:35335) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bqd30-0005Zf-PS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Oct 2016 05:27:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bqd30-0006qV-HZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Oct 2016 05:27:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 02 Oct 2016 09:27:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 24583 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 24583-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B24583.147540041326298 (code B ref 24583); Sun, 02 Oct 2016 09:27:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 24583) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Oct 2016 09:26:53 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41525 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bqd2q-0006q6-Vz for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 02 Oct 2016 05:26:53 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]:64124) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bqd2p-0006pr-Ak for 24583@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 02 Oct 2016 05:26:51 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([212.95.7.70]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LzbXq-1amzVG1Eqg-014kG1; Sun, 02 Oct 2016 11:26:44 +0200 In-Reply-To: X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:R82j1yuXV/DPs00u5QL49iUlrmnE8DvQIPWuKOzWFb6BcL4Pnqs RtgBHYC2ruiEn0VUq78hMkgRKWrfgpILCxTflAjRQuPnwljQYdOCV0jXP9uP9stsDjBtykQ 3VF8QlSRv38YkT5svfQZaCZZldr5mARvaPh6m4XWx0CtIbVeTBln5wYUj+A7WcQGV/BZESm c7uLcCe+LaR6xSGZuGwrw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:e89MTJVg1Oc=:UhLDPUUeGEIJtBaV7SXCPj yjYgaxptGbDa+SUKDgot0u0kkLsXhZIceNwuCFHbvtTkMmxnVXH9gXKDLD2pg3R29oyOfItpo R7nTgnC08iScTUL3d0fRp0CYeS0ER9RMhsGrkRWVaW9O/ow+KPNaBaUTE2AXASpBouiLvBCa2 1d2uIx2MAafZegNIZOk8hiJYpWESkOzAmjdgFjK/fjxSixgVpWPtQoDN6t6Rah0Ar1XBYznLA 9pA9QiTDFPPQkNRZPp4fvqxZJ6KpM8EYV/NhBdkAy7Q7phiD8yQjEa+8P9tVh1Y71YVmgvXjC nWGveKacFrp+OeYF9WmKW9T4rf3vR4yA2orpvPzbnVmzqKJqLHsTUd9t6hK02gtbaJSt3oGdZ +bcTe9JuUtfwrv41a+dFcH8m5ZO9NzSjBMsxrpcn3n6ZqH6MofxOxNCUjwdi/yH+sI01u2JMC WltndELMq4jnmyYqb03y58Yay2NI8cdKO2xExJnBtQhwphl/DhBtRRu6e3RxsLZr7gMXMoSu3 y/heb02aIgMMw2h7LooHYFfjbPuew6HktvxYN3AM0MtcQG6XIpjujYvY1QuRDD3T0z5dg769m /snU1N8GmAmIEd11OpJIFr/ToyGxghQIzt890rIx+rq1ns4IzLLjmr8gm+8KTNnzeOnkcg9Za 24Q+3m0spNS9BKFW2+rzYzbWNX19SkpTCEqz8jURnwryFhvP6opBGG+FbJ1rS4h4sS/pdp5oH V8o4e8q8NWkpTl7+WopHDVqHb/BC2JdCKNoP1r1AYGD2rVoYabIxIhA5g8ONOSdSAQMbog8j X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:123896 Archived-At: Please do CC to 24583@debbugs.gnu.org as I asked before. This might be of interest for other people as well. > Yes new frame doesn't glitch. But existing frames do, correct? What happens when you explicitly call =E2=80=98x-wm-set-size-hint=E2=80=99= for such an existing frame? After having customized =E2=80=98frame-resize-pixelwise=E2= =80=99 to t, obviously. martin