From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#24526: iconify / geometry Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 09:10:05 +0200 Message-ID: <57EA1B4D.1000203@gmx.at> References: <2404679.08DogL2IpK@djunix> <37821149.ecOJEZikFG@djunix> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1474960293 18295 195.159.176.226 (27 Sep 2016 07:11:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 07:11:33 +0000 (UTC) To: "Dr.-Ing. Dieter Jurzitza" , 24526@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 27 09:11:25 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bomXq-0002St-KN for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 27 Sep 2016 09:11:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48428 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bomXp-0003M4-4Q for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 27 Sep 2016 03:11:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34879) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bomXi-0003Li-9k for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Sep 2016 03:11:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bomXe-0006Az-2E for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Sep 2016 03:11:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:58923) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bomXd-0006Av-Ut for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Sep 2016 03:11:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bomXd-0000kY-Rp for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Sep 2016 03:11:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 07:11:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 24526 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 24526-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B24526.14749602212830 (code B ref 24526); Tue, 27 Sep 2016 07:11:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 24526) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Sep 2016 07:10:21 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36880 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bomWz-0000ja-34 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 27 Sep 2016 03:10:21 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.19]:50595) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bomWx-0000jO-Bi for 24526@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 27 Sep 2016 03:10:19 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([212.95.7.89]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M5Lqx-1b1Bwg1rKx-00zVhv; Tue, 27 Sep 2016 09:10:13 +0200 In-Reply-To: <37821149.ecOJEZikFG@djunix> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:0HEV6dXwW3/B/Vt2ZOBsgCB5DwFGvMSMgg+ROHevDi3KmEq7Sgw MAvR8HFc5zf9+0VJd4WBWwQ3Dai/VoCchVvXAeZZ2VrXE2ej5Dx7d01nkmBCNTErlL9Tzb/ AqyoxDfF5rqKKdfN1YdzMPhvjC47eZxlIaqD5EXdRq6mkkr0ninTQ1E/ybddrqBNF3q2e3m CcXTyPRDEY008SgFQoVcg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:i/sZ9wersRo=:kFi0Hke1cxgtQAikcjYyDD YKK+xD2CRVQ1uoGOLaFrZqroqyQak3Sd9TYc+E0Vj7Botzjy4I6F3mQgVXn4iXtD6YrlNiG54 46ybIvLijs+nHR9EtfvPLPhF5XlU3qWfwa4bVpOiNAZmASyjDw6A9vSCK1PUPb+K3rmt5R0ew StGPcE3vwZLUh8vC91KIf6zGaDfC8i2HVrr4Y9fv+R4xiQ99slyYMrLzkOwELhFvJHmwAHW/d qd825ArkwbxaL7b8qB4xSFe28S49C6WeUb1R2jNdSOi6u5d/qtnjedirFdk0vcKRImFk3otC6 c8A0htL28D9PYFBsnjCf7dM5myR6gfrHaVwHUVOKgCH8AlCrdwJPh/dTKYcWwYRy0KA0smLOl 42Xc0wvb+UsQlYMy6h+5YA8gRDAZd/+ZF07fPKltgqHJ4O/SQ8t5B3ClA7jF4TltnA6C0FhLQ I9/AI4r/u541zNx4IQfeRTSThsxNDGUt3bVagVrNRBK3E1cNGJNr/9j6NMuXhjz+Hw12f1cBz +n6c47srljB+3xSmmGPBhaSwsUQfMnFD6ufc9xZA/BPfk5f7AeKR4Mw/slJoPaganl81f1ql/ mXrKN7w+GhocMRC63gvLR2ZWSaXPw9BBegC0IBsK+ib1ycUSn/wjrAdIotphqZ6FFSxl1bMkw diVbFsB8LqdJmQvqA1VPKKM2rr6YbasC6XBjJwUNbPKOnPDYyzlXD/OIySdu/lBckFDUtJpUi vK9N2Z5OGSAb90TsT7pkBwmzH7W7ecwfuv6nMjpdGvG3Fy3TwTHyjyJirKLYKv7bUVj3W2gO X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:123712 Archived-At: > I elaborated a little further on this topic. Say, I was to start emacs= (25.1) > with > > emacs -geometry 135x34+35+20 -iconic > > xwininfo tells me: [...] > Corners: +41+57 -320+57 -320-336 +41-336 What do these corner values mean? > -geometry 109x24+35+20 > > after "uniconifying" the frame. Leaving "-iconic" away, things come ou= t as > expected. I have no idea how 109x24 would correlate with 135x34. Neither do I. Please tell me what =E2=80=98frame-geometry=E2=80=99 tells= about this frame. Maybe it's relaed to the frame's default font size. The surprising thing about this is that here on Windows the -geometry option is processed as expected. So this looks like a good place to start investigating this on Windows. Can anyone on GNU/Linux try with Dieter's options, that is emacs -geometry 135x34+35+20 -iconic and report here _if they work_ as expected? Thanks, martin