From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#24193: 25.1; `window-min-size' fails for horizontal width when margins >= body text Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 09:35:25 +0200 Message-ID: <57B2C23D.3090109@gmx.at> References: <1470734067.1046352.690034953.5B0A54FE@webmail.messagingengine.com> <57A9A714.4010600@gmx.at> <1470736919.1056423.690073473.51DB916F@webmail.messagingengine.com> <57A9AD24.6090303@gmx.at> <1470739033.1062589.690104169.1A130EC9@webmail.messagingengine.com> <83ziomgfcd.fsf@gnu.org> <1470755912.754355.690353977.4F305064@webmail.messagingengine.com> <83r39ygcr5.fsf@gnu.org> <1471151490.3505042.694683657.3D32B261@webmail.messagingengine.com> <831t1rh14o.fsf@gnu.org> <57B17D1C.7070200@gmx.at> <1471255343.1036269.695518577.5049CAE8@webmail.messagingengine.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1471332983 18008 195.159.176.226 (16 Aug 2016 07:36:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 07:36:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 24193@debbugs.gnu.org To: Paul Rankin Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 16 09:36:19 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bZYv4-0004Qz-Nx for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 09:36:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40543 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bZYuy-0006vJ-RQ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 03:36:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35996) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bZYus-0006v4-Ap for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 03:36:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bZYuo-0006Eh-Ao for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 03:36:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:32786) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bZYuo-0006Ed-77 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 03:36:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bZYuo-0001tx-03 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 03:36:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 07:36:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 24193 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 24193-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B24193.14713329457275 (code B ref 24193); Tue, 16 Aug 2016 07:36:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 24193) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Aug 2016 07:35:45 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58728 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bZYuX-0001tH-Hd for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 03:35:45 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.18]:50486) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bZYuV-0001t2-6h for 24193@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 03:35:43 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([212.95.7.103]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx002) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MhAAr-1bmzA42QGP-00MIHq; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 09:35:33 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1471255343.1036269.695518577.5049CAE8@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:KoaCKP5mCrvk6EtqOek/SyKQ3VWZWAQbPPvsFXxO19bucuXFU1i 6del+r6+gWp53sBDKrj4SOfTKadiz5zZohcNsDU0m928oKicJICD3+6CI6lOZJitRTcoeQB Nq1hgboGuLgFPo7/OyML8PCVavxI/8C3SN701sfokSQWnXIAEOlsuD+oE4ddDVQshBkr2AP B6cYhnLq9LZCMOifoceBw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:Qpf7aG0TXzM=:yJJ/BulU98B6fIpO5vHklM 5wFSoER6HjVEw4+6BVoSt5uyOtz4qoFwJXynI0XpDra9eMDL8C5sBVzMXHzh5FrNenF2ivL+E GUuoBe2W7qiCB5Mq9X1d+uCG6g7XhqQmE8inPZ0EkamRASlbawmGeuxY34b/OJvoLT41QZ+RX MBZURLo3dMLav5MWHLqURk0L9rd/GvYvnDPEcxvedS8y2uKvglwxHcs5M/Bccq5ihZk2SLdu1 gaa9rGyhYd8QxXknHbC3aCyzSSnh6nPI5G2IW6+csTmffd572DTnNMu3xI50/wnI4prR7ZUqm EAWcoAt8vt+2n0lLgcWXgIoehN/9x8GSBqKRZjMX0W9mCSjNK4SsFk0WnnDd89f+3zzJ71rOI Lxe9/ePhk4ty0U3XSK2ME3lJGp54Oi8qwbPdIigOV3ajyfiCgGg52HRUZh6l4vqBwYcTUpxt1 q9V6gSwtLNnDdokgqzFO0LSdTjcmmqVFoM6AIWgz1v6AKvXjjEMyvMC/QW6tcxvTV5aD4Lfl4 byMPX3Aw/Rag9z+Vllw3t28vGUaYo/GpzmqhDudAwGGDdZ/FkitNWMtbphaE0FJ1qF47/WYPU oguPd2ogxuvJYxCVo8s56hJpTJPB9HKqPmucVGFsePtzL8fXhQOEuolYppocEMe1b0Woe3/Wd aHmXE/S/Pme1uw7TF03orrXjhB1gseUVXnMqfsAR28PIK8ub9l0CZSSbZnXNPjVVHdxoka01Y dNjndkncgY5Hf86DAt4dHwenVsWaTOxv5VtiZjhDmZiXZ86VWOApBPBSv9RM10oKUceYIu2w X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:122265 Archived-At: > If/when this is replaced, would this bug thread to be referenced? It > would certainly help with updating the modes affected. The commit references the bug number. > I guess etiquette would dictate that a mode should set these to the > maximum of the existing value or its own for cases when two modes want > control of minimum margin width.... is that a case that can arise? I > guess it is..... Hopefully such a case never arises. Having two modes use the same hooks to impose their idea of how to size margins is asking for trouble. martin