From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#24085: 25.1.50; `make-frame' given `top' param creates frame with ~10x smaller `top' Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2016 21:07:32 +0200 Message-ID: <579A57F4.5020401@gmx.at> References: <0bfd2e8d-9d9b-4737-a637-5175eaaf41c0@default> <57987CBA.2060405@gmx.at> <3657859c-03f1-4eca-9a78-a9be0dee6552@default> <5799C8F4.6060205@gmx.at> <3a0be54b-1373-4ab3-b560-3891a2e5035e@default> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1469733495 22309 80.91.229.3 (28 Jul 2016 19:18:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2016 19:18:15 +0000 (UTC) To: Drew Adams , 24085@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jul 28 21:18:03 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1bSqol-0007vd-5S for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2016 21:18:03 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55266 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bSqoe-0006IL-Sc for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2016 15:17:56 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48779) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bSqf6-0008IR-Ro for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2016 15:08:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bSqf4-0003E6-Th for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2016 15:08:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:52327) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bSqf4-0003E2-QT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2016 15:08:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bSqf4-0005Wo-ND for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2016 15:08:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2016 19:08:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 24085 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 24085-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B24085.146973286521217 (code B ref 24085); Thu, 28 Jul 2016 19:08:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 24085) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Jul 2016 19:07:45 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49623 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bSqen-0005W8-Eq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2016 15:07:45 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.15]:53687) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bSqem-0005Vx-Gg for 24085@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2016 15:07:44 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.168.1.101] ([212.95.7.84]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx002) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Lgql4-1aykPw242w-00oJA7; Thu, 28 Jul 2016 21:07:34 +0200 In-Reply-To: <3a0be54b-1373-4ab3-b560-3891a2e5035e@default> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:mpC3N77e6WoBiYiCJIf1SpKjjkx4DRrdYLu6pneL8tTp4kz2VyP NF9/WckxXfDc5uhgLgE6lI8ZWeeUztOaC/xsS8FG5PwDjBTKavrsBQsNEntPUizRY/rurHg RYb9x/gBq2raQO5rpvIuOxtPYzWrJVv/IJRioNzeYoSM674lUTt4Ih/9pcNx/Au9pgoOPpy WBcJcLwQAWymjlH3iQHCw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:sY5HgW89Xz4=:kooiKf7OMs57Gie9GArJFa DOEV/pRmh6t7+fge44WTfNssfe0ktHhP36sunpHophapdaNwRtOwS1ozVh2nW8TOUekxZ39bJ DTkg3cSE6LD48x2A2lERQ2FwD9Fuwzu7iXIr9LIu7ki6svePHIEWQT/rHNUmKd2iusYIQk4Ga dLr/h9jsuTPi0go83ga8tqFknAzNrjLgocGevvGDbh0gm5qiaMnV91qyevy5FBd1lvDfPP/1G czrLnxS7ShQ4OVFjzYbGLt0FtE6wOx3AaO6Qui4zh3w5BzpNh+nvx/quzV7SSXk2UqANEy9Mq H0iUgJh5qb75K9mFJ4qhuldKMaQxYyDNyvSU2tddMgDJseqKs1Bhwd19LdaMCjL2FS9l9QD9X WJIh47lSBokaU6cMV+oRnZhJPh92L7IQjTmSFqjJTRfCXoDUfxj9Tmc75gwmyjjC5y7pPyX8w XIKsvAEvaM7DksVO10KNUH1YQcPPnKk0RiGJklkNFxGQOfldlSt4OmmwEySWOiu0XCRA5SbN+ 3AzZ52ZuU5sRWZYui0RGAaLieYK04FNxFhJCcD7OSF1CWQ+25rvnyR37abS3gsqYGKuYUhWjF aJagjwX9WAUd0GW9U86LYX0uRT+oLJYuCnCvHFxRJxkXvYafBuR/p7xYQfQ1ZV9ZIFlt8IeqC 7KUGcEOaY6PPWf1G6+4sVnTkrSfkt5RLJWFl74X4TRQaCk2MQhA4ZV0ZyrAWeG5DPXvfPt/oC 5lZjSnQUTQJyaQk/1x/6JJ+PxOF3A3/uJH+ZxGV2F3sWZ5isAPDxML6WrDHooPUCSgYmVVU1 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:121645 Archived-At: > 2. I thought that the code change responsible for this > (intentional) regression was the one you cited from 2006, > and I thought that was only for MS Windows (w32term.c), so > I thought that change would not have any effect on other > platforms. There was no need. The behavior on GNU/Linux preceded that on MS Windows. I can't tell about the behavior on other systems. > 3. Refusing to create a frame that is completely off screen > is one thing. Refusing to create a frame that is even slightly > off screen (e.g. echo area) is another thing. Is the former or > the latter what you were referring to (by "most window > managers...")? Here xfce positions the frame exactly like Windows does, right above the taskbar. I have no idea whether this similarity was intentional. martin