From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#24085: 25.1.50; `make-frame' given `top' param creates frame with ~10x smaller `top' Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2016 21:07:03 +0200 Message-ID: <579A57D7.4050302@gmx.at> References: <0bfd2e8d-9d9b-4737-a637-5175eaaf41c0@default> <57987CBA.2060405@gmx.at> <3657859c-03f1-4eca-9a78-a9be0dee6552@default> <5799C8F4.6060205@gmx.at> <83wpk5rf50.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1469733035 18305 80.91.229.3 (28 Jul 2016 19:10:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2016 19:10:35 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 24085@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jul 28 21:10:18 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1bSqhG-0004Js-I8 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2016 21:10:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55222 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bSqhA-0001Zr-9V for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2016 15:10:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48800) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bSqf8-0008SN-AJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2016 15:08:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bSqf4-0003Dw-MP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2016 15:08:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:52326) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bSqf4-0003Dm-Iq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2016 15:08:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bSqf4-0005Wg-8v for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2016 15:08:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2016 19:08:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 24085 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 24085-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B24085.146973284021179 (code B ref 24085); Thu, 28 Jul 2016 19:08:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 24085) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Jul 2016 19:07:20 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49620 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bSqeO-0005VX-7X for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2016 15:07:20 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.19]:55145) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bSqeL-0005VI-S7 for 24085@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2016 15:07:18 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.168.1.101] ([212.95.7.84]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M1Wcz-1b9Oqp2IIr-00tR1h; Thu, 28 Jul 2016 21:07:06 +0200 In-Reply-To: <83wpk5rf50.fsf@gnu.org> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:DL9oR1O0Xr6iWUwjST/mnaowylNsvlZIxRqRgCTU7tR7KdFZgox XmXIkk19SdtzdvD5Rs69L5wYJBU9J6xjg2Jb+Z6jkxFPqnzj57v7lUGxaMVjknAY+OLV0Yv bgh3Ydg2/MUbzt7ChtJgr+lcCr7K0FvebR1+qM7CawC7UKYc+TM4BDxMhWbVFG1vAra6V9a 85lWag16gCvlCtYF4pu7g== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:X7Kahtbo7ic=:H7Hy1qYZqrIqUoyVrUxp7W 1uU/rBPYpsAxtA/tgaPcuptmgf5leXdp1wa6g4goujLKP8txqymgWmZU9eO4+M9XYUCuhEvaT PAnBX5iAP2j4Kagiplj6c6GPEdIG1myJnW4s9mz3SOzyugN4fXmcZ2YXbWzTdrF8SsbHgAH06 UBglfHfUku78AXdMP7ATav5vbvj2/y2UO2a+s+QncPSS7kUvQMh2ZQ3jT0kl6K5qet7x90kGt hEODKTjET1VLwIBv8t8BF674KL8R2hkQDwTU22Cp9vSstLiAuv19zQiha9txaLFn2wm0Eou9S YcVBiTBSHZueUo3DGvL+kaDzYfFKQfVnUwbw/1M59S+di940gwkVewlYAUZKjfz7eQG0lQ+0J hIhDpihiyrYbh6N0b9h2CkRX9D7hjLrZHi++klJqe4ihQEogWw/2irgLNehI2S8uNXrxuvP6q H3DQyVxt/DejndbK6T7qyfZTdE0Y/2XSHKjLVT+UqjcaAPEibxrCAKGPNDBvVmF3pSOI3CmUS DH7qXlgg4IMKr4MnDHaiGCtgxOArobbP9me34LkZfZYADrgXbMUz34YCwkAURYZ6ukZpIezKZ w8oFfixs0R9XF7279IfWgCuktBktP+vHTRjdV32DStFv8H9D4yUzsk7GUzVUPDzQepVnpnLqO E7EVgfxIOkAhUaYNk7EQA/Iz2nbuGDwH+L3UonZdOlFv1Pdf9YsloFBEuNh6K39Xf8DTVlx4Q OLTX3pH34dGMsH65Ae3sxi/XyY0hypnAZoXoddLXHnSRdIT0Lry/ra9gwKFkTUPUxQvFVa9I X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:121644 Archived-At: > Do they also refuse to move a frame so that part of it is off the > screen? Or is the above only enforced for the initial location of the > frame? Only for the initial location of the frame. After that you can move the frame off screen. martin