From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Mike Kupfer Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#59094: 29.0.50; ediff-revision flags wrong lines in etc/HELLO Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2022 07:49:36 -0800 Message-ID: <5768.1667836176@alto> References: <60611.1667798946@alto> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="22113"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 59094@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 07 16:50:20 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1os4OC-0005Yr-MI for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 07 Nov 2022 16:50:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1os4Ny-0006Jt-51; Mon, 07 Nov 2022 10:50:06 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1os4Nu-0006J9-LW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Nov 2022 10:50:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1os4Nu-0007Zk-D7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Nov 2022 10:50:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1os4Nu-00069l-8Y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Nov 2022 10:50:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Mike Kupfer Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2022 15:50:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 59094 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 59094-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B59094.166783618823640 (code B ref 59094); Mon, 07 Nov 2022 15:50:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 59094) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Nov 2022 15:49:48 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35150 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1os4Ng-00069D-5f for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 07 Nov 2022 10:49:48 -0500 Original-Received: from shell1.rawbw.com ([198.144.192.42]:63653 ident=root) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1os4Ne-000693-9m for 59094@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 07 Nov 2022 10:49:46 -0500 Original-Received: from alto (135-180-174-133.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net [135.180.174.133] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by shell1.rawbw.com (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTPSA id 2A7FnbIt022503 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 7 Nov 2022 07:49:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mkupfer@alum.berkeley.edu) X-Authentication-Warning: shell1.rawbw.com: Host 135-180-174-133.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net [135.180.174.133] (may be forged) claimed to be alto In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 07 Nov 2022 17:10:36 +0200." <835yfqztoz.fsf@gnu.org> X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7.1; Emacs 29.0.50 Content-ID: <5767.1667836176.1@alto> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:247286 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii wrote: > I don't think Ediff can cope with portions of the file that disappear > from buffer text. All the annotations that enriched.el eats up when > decoding the file are visible to Diff, and they get in the way of > counting characters. Ah, thanks, I hadn't realized that there were hidden annotations. I thought all the magic incantations were in the local variable settings at the end of the buffer. Are the charset tags (annotations) really necessary, given the setting of 'coding' in the local variables? (If the answer is "yes" and there is documentation available that would explain why, feel free to simply point me at the documentation. If the answer is "yes" and there's no documentation, feel free to just say "yes". I understand that this area of Emacs can be complicated, and I don't really need to know the details.) The reason I ask is that the files that I saved last night from the old and new Ediff buffers can be reloaded, and Ediff is able to correctly show the changes. Yet I don't see any visual distinctions between the new file and etc/HELLO, even though the new file's mode is just Fundamental, not Fundamental Enriched. (Even the orange text on lines 1 and 34 is duplicated in the saved file, which I confess puzzles me.) mike