From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Pit--Claudel Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#23341: x-show-tip does not respect the value of tooltip-hide-delay, and the default tooltip timeout isn't configurable Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2016 10:40:58 -0400 Message-ID: <571CDAFA.6060002@live.com> References: <571AE240.2090103@live.com> <571B2EA6.80906@gmx.at> <571B866F.8060401@live.com> <571BAC1B.30408@gmx.at> <571BB03F.5000906@live.com> <571C8674.5050702@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="LLLKjdMODhIct5gT3xcuhKQ49Mr29Wi7M" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1461508944 15000 80.91.229.3 (24 Apr 2016 14:42:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2016 14:42:24 +0000 (UTC) To: martin rudalics , 23341@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Apr 24 16:42:13 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1auLEi-0003Vh-LW for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 24 Apr 2016 16:42:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55651 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1auLEe-00010l-Tm for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 24 Apr 2016 10:42:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48977) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1auLEc-0000zN-5q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Apr 2016 10:42:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1auLEY-000264-Uv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Apr 2016 10:42:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:32787) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1auLEY-00025y-RR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Apr 2016 10:42:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1auLEY-0004wF-6q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Apr 2016 10:42:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Pit--Claudel Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2016 14:42:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 23341 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 23341-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B23341.146150886818918 (code B ref 23341); Sun, 24 Apr 2016 14:42:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 23341) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Apr 2016 14:41:08 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45124 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1auLDg-0004v4-0t for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 24 Apr 2016 10:41:08 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.187]:62600) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1auLDe-0004uU-QW for 23341@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 24 Apr 2016 10:41:07 -0400 Original-Received: from [18.189.83.142] ([18.189.83.142]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue003) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MJoUy-1atFHs0nTw-0018J8; Sun, 24 Apr 2016 16:41:00 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 In-Reply-To: <571C8674.5050702@gmx.at> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:Nq0Y/TROsrhJKqc5YtHOiFVV6z05EVBT8VOft5oL3AXG+L7nLzO 10U6IHFs8Biwy8ASkuRNNd5UTVl51SzZmp3R/6Un5D8j4sfoIo6Iqwa520dgeWfRAD31kCg xU5IgM+x1k/cPnnuoKCaEMO8qBD5pNH0hAeK/WUxW3kctHTM6t3p8+kJ6LX7Ff6JA6FCVls ry46w0SnLkD7vnw/ri5gQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:HJIRKf0biGc=:RuSjLjWDWkNHee5GXf0BWd foPZTedD7PE/gxexdRFKTpGQ/TI+HKtxLdCGVFpML+XuO657chUmGvTiN3NWG8yidto+GpeIa nsiqrUjW/QbeBoEXkwoYHBRLX+gIqcGzqcxhser64JMd8jpAEEyvg5AzjAaUEgDd0WnQluGQN Ouk9KqQrwy7CNqT4289U1U+cl2H8ySmKwY7QL8udJPXGE0wSetJ0LPHAXt1D4724gN0NEFGuJ JtJRWeG081j3fVIXREuBTIQAXl0hBHu+qMvW/hpEtmzX0ro5IQHTEkoKtBqLLHE19n9hC0vq0 KYBlfPGSzmvf2OBqlGGdzzp15OI3bpU1oBBc/a9rraBM5+Bxovnvp2Yic1+zrdKFJMBmu9ClR 5/YMdevxVrpl2ha8stgw/+ar1MlTtsuCfvbKQdEUG+hSlHQ8VmhbLgNFgZzgz6F6N7PlzfHCt JUOhkp28REh4Qps1kphmdJeuJxNenmgmsWaowPCDkaQWBd87PKJOY63VgLs6r/I+JVJRrX5DC H3RzpFJll2GNE3zKaJGCIs9NzxnbLSWFWsJtI2wS8x39GpEVDZBtY80b9di31b7lKdCcaRggg //s8zLNztqlJ62XP8Rq1ZLY8nqXdDe9g80SEJRieDP3Hiuota0D9XHjXRGdM9Eskfu7nTB9JR OxeqgcQndWNc4F4rSpVY0DJQ/8TO9sgCtfAgaotVqPRwffsc1wT/TXON/MxkzXTFtKgM= X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:116757 Archived-At: This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --LLLKjdMODhIct5gT3xcuhKQ49Mr29Wi7M Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="tTnHHgQoN0vfDCNH7UgnqBVsBjUI7dIRW" From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=c3=a9ment_Pit--Claudel?= To: martin rudalics , 23341@debbugs.gnu.org Message-ID: <571CDAFA.6060002@live.com> Subject: Re: bug#23341: x-show-tip does not respect the value of tooltip-hide-delay, and the default tooltip timeout isn't configurable References: <571AE240.2090103@live.com> <571B2EA6.80906@gmx.at> <571B866F.8060401@live.com> <571BAC1B.30408@gmx.at> <571BB03F.5000906@live.com> <571C8674.5050702@gmx.at> In-Reply-To: <571C8674.5050702@gmx.at> --tTnHHgQoN0vfDCNH7UgnqBVsBjUI7dIRW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2016-04-24 04:40, martin rudalics wrote: > If you can think of a better solution with less surprising results > for the user please tell me. Isn't using the value of tooltip-hide-delay (or of a new similar variable= ) as the default in x-show-tip such a solution? In other words, what downside does it have? Sorry if I missed one. All th= at I've seen for now is mentions that this was an internal detail. Cl=C3=A9ment. --tTnHHgQoN0vfDCNH7UgnqBVsBjUI7dIRW-- --LLLKjdMODhIct5gT3xcuhKQ49Mr29Wi7M Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJXHNr6AAoJEPqg+cTm90wjgD4QAJ+fKOfdz+UZqZSvjEfPxea8 vhxTih9qC2RB1Rn59MHBIC6g4UDyyPA9ha/I7qyZjHiRYfqBOiOz2bnG0AS0kcBv YDN9nbyyeGFyRoAO/VaynKtKOA1Y/rcsAGM/zp/lQZbl6YrNouUmbVTrelUpYkn+ EaDHag5b4QmZtMPFemt0/gbFu+iN3npbgK0YtD8RnveI4BPMA2jo3qE+FYJ12MK0 UV0YcGGzxtw3Q/wM3kxcx/LPgMqYbhYzxxVXKfNKNC2s10D6fpmbDqKWD93H11kw iytuoN3crpDavIfwX2DspwVr5z7Ol6XdBPh8R1Q+E3mDlFl1RTt/X8iCnTLVO9YI WTbFmNG/f4i/r1TZZUGN6MFmQTkKykcykwZF3Zj/0rAlw8GRZSqRU9y4zZREt9KI ChgFv7T6uZPTal1EGrLANR80UlK4zwEGVeAdKHegO+Z5qU9A2t4Bm485VcHJ9bA0 C/7VjOwRed4gERATRxnl9iLcd8Kqio6VcNHPXJ/3rYX6/ulYct0aCil2stJ0jplS aH1JifwCFVJ0hqZbhK+IWvY6XVcRntWAftMl+iUl+SwkrmOrfsCq+JiOAChf7sGI 6pUXxmff0ScukovSb6qxylh3G4Mpa9VhDdH8EXaueRNj+ylKEPQmINb5n/ackAnI tUS+dP3nt12isP3hi4fw =m5X+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --LLLKjdMODhIct5gT3xcuhKQ49Mr29Wi7M--