From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#23320: 25.0.92; Window width not updated after frame resize (Win32 and GTK) Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 11:15:05 +0200 Message-ID: <57189A19.5070002@gmx.at> References: <571788DC.20001@gmx.at> <83potk720x.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1461230202 27349 80.91.229.3 (21 Apr 2016 09:16:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 09:16:42 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 23320@debbugs.gnu.org, andlind@gmail.com To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 21 11:16:31 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1atAic-0006nQ-JY for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 11:16:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37560 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1atAib-0003O5-Jl for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 05:16:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47440) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1atAiV-0003HK-Dt for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 05:16:11 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1atAiQ-0008BX-7E for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 05:16:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:57837) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1atAiQ-0008BS-43 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 05:16:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1atAiQ-0001F4-0T for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 05:16:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 09:16:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 23320 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 23320-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B23320.14612301204724 (code B ref 23320); Thu, 21 Apr 2016 09:16:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 23320) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Apr 2016 09:15:20 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41941 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1atAhj-0001E7-Nn for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 05:15:19 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.21]:60211) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1atAhi-0001Ds-1E for 23320@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 05:15:18 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([212.95.7.65]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M96Jd-1b1B3b0ptF-00CPWo; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 11:15:10 +0200 In-Reply-To: <83potk720x.fsf@gnu.org> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:ullr5g7bFfe19YZa4L8zoksNXEY/uUegJED8yUprvxBxSiU7Mzl Ds0o9Ktt+V1P6SPs8nHNIykpXD9iTgSuLmZLFJn+yMECqjoJ/+G1pBBNptp2W/pVaiLwnkW 4Vyh7XtZjS3+zMPYo+nHDnMS2sLESAX690oFXvxtwfwF5WVmoB+431LsJ3hTxmkoqHOzAod 13eje6bEZ+JOoROzkZoug== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:junyxDjdNRM=:BuMaxC2NNxmdPG3axJ/4a7 G0bf6qJ6CyZb339Sz6DGg2M435Eb2SVXqljcI6lFiKdPgRQtkdIQwuhIbIPPHNaewqdspYorR AzzJtiINX3M+QmGsdv8OrU4upuKU8+NvmfDplKfQOI6LAI4lyTIPdZ/uxM9B/aZM6h90aMLQB UE7rqU2D01UWkrX3sRHwGlBGlSp/94VVjnZ01j/WGvIaPVIGv85M1B6mGNSczBDdSULuQyEN/ zqONWNoz3DDnbWMCB8kv0DzYu9QjrsuNAZeS0PNtkne6QGkizWlU6xx4+r7DwuvdFKb2wzdzA NcNCQTAE6xvAkg7T7YgZVT/LunMy+I++9N7kry/iopHn4IAywysY3NM4ogU3wgxHN3y1ooXuw iH4M9NVR4Iqohd5srfk5AKozZYA47BoShBP9YiSTKEgm+avQ1/nePlayzBUBx4UIUrOs1hY3M hcR40q8i3gWG4GTw5muaJp2eeI7JC9o4DRr95ibw+DrlxH87jWgcawylZom2v8ueZt0Dax/33 RzdhH9mRDAyJryGJ0wicwcnaCJgpExBplRzkHjvjTJN2n2o1GT6Qx03fsmo1jxUe3e7HbdYmn kT7bsYmL5SrIrE1v+K+2c6hCzMgh4Ey6G4L8+M6GmuNucCjX62uQMa2i0m2DhSRhDBW5/2L6t xNgiCSokmDOu4ykyAkNt4M36+WEpd4zcKmUYsYPK4AcVoeMCAJhaCA2kS3slB1PWX9oTN2mZK YPR7tMOcAlnqKkYwV+DUgfl4JKKKPNR+aLO/s9P64bTTQru1vd/5uyUr+rwxu5Sx/+d8UDek X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:116645 Archived-At: > Isn't it true that expecting the frame dimensions change immediately > is unreliable? According to Jan "Lisp code that expects resize changes to be handeled synchronously and in order are fundamentally broken". > If so, there's no bug here. But he also said that ours is "an attempt to be nice to Lisp". The X port handles this via x_wait_for_event. IIRC you proposed to do the same for the w32 port. Either I try (and it will take some days or maybe weeks), or you do (and it will take some minutes or maybe hours) or you tell me what I have to do and we might be able to finish this task somewhere in between. How do we proceed? martin