From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Drew Adams Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#14714: 24.3.50; `isearch-filter-predicate(s)' Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 07:19:34 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <571658f2-b490-4705-ac56-a332535d0eb7@default> References: <0035874e-8b46-4205-bd79-8d84c79eeb98@default> <8efa3204-b8ed-44ae-86c6-ad3fecac3a50@default> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1372257175 26911 80.91.229.3 (26 Jun 2013 14:32:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 14:32:55 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 14714@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier , Juri Linkov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jun 26 16:32:53 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UrqmC-0003XO-9E for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 26 Jun 2013 16:32:52 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50499 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UrqmB-00065y-SW for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 26 Jun 2013 10:32:51 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53065) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Urqm7-00061I-Em for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Jun 2013 10:32:48 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Urqm1-0005M2-Qr for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Jun 2013 10:32:47 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:48639) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UrqZn-0001L3-Jd for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Jun 2013 10:20:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UrqZm-0003rT-Cv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Jun 2013 10:20:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Drew Adams Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 14:20:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 14714 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 14714-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B14714.137225638614798 (code B ref 14714); Wed, 26 Jun 2013 14:20:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 14714) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Jun 2013 14:19:46 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42954 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UrqZW-0003qc-5j for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Jun 2013 10:19:46 -0400 Original-Received: from userp1040.oracle.com ([156.151.31.81]:33759) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UrqZT-0003pe-Cz for 14714@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Jun 2013 10:19:43 -0400 Original-Received: from acsinet21.oracle.com (acsinet21.oracle.com [141.146.126.237]) by userp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1) with ESMTP id r5QEDHL5022769 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 26 Jun 2013 14:13:18 GMT Original-Received: from userz7021.oracle.com (userz7021.oracle.com [156.151.31.85]) by acsinet21.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r5QEJZ3h029718 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 26 Jun 2013 14:19:36 GMT Original-Received: from abhmt115.oracle.com (abhmt115.oracle.com [141.146.116.67]) by userz7021.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r5QEJYHE008270; Wed, 26 Jun 2013 14:19:34 GMT In-Reply-To: X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Oracle Beehive Extensions for Outlook 2.0.1.7 (607090) [OL 12.0.6668.5000 (x86)] X-Source-IP: acsinet21.oracle.com [141.146.126.237] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:75610 Archived-At: > > Can you please say why you think so? > > Do you imagine it is obvious? It is not, to me at least. >=20 > Please don't hijack this discussion. I am not hijacking anything. I am the one who filed this bug report. And I proposed a simple fix for it from the outset - a minor correction of = what Juri had already coded and along the lines of what has been done in th= e past. You proposed a different fix. Fine. But you gave no reason - nothing abou= t any problems with the more usual approach or any advantages of your new a= pproach. I asked about that. I am interested in learning the advantages of your nov= el approach of (IIUC) advising a single hook function as a substitute for a= llowing for a sequence of hook functions. I did not say that your solution is not a good one. I assume the contrary,= in fact. I am asking to understand why you think it is a better one. Tha= t's all. Understanding this can help with other code as well, presumably. Is there = a reason why you do not want to share your understanding?