From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Paul Eggert Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#22086: 25.1.50; [PATCH] Integrate the musl hybrid mallo Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 15:08:19 -0800 Organization: UCLA Computer Science Department Message-ID: <56AFE563.6080105@cs.ucla.edu> References: <56AC7FA1.10300@cs.ucla.edu> <83powjwgl0.fsf@gnu.org> <56AD58B0.9050103@cs.ucla.edu> <85egcxsndr.fsf@iznogoud.viz> <56AE4A52.6030507@cs.ucla.edu> <85r3gwbgsl.fsf@iznogoud.viz> <56AF8ED2.4060800@cs.ucla.edu> <85lh74b7pv.fsf@iznogoud.viz> <83y4b4z0f2.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1454368164 22736 80.91.229.3 (1 Feb 2016 23:09:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 23:09:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 22086@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii , Wolfgang Jenkner Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 02 00:09:12 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aQNap-0008EP-9b for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 02 Feb 2016 00:09:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54424 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aQNao-0004rU-5V for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 01 Feb 2016 18:09:10 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57603) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aQNak-0004pP-Cz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Feb 2016 18:09:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aQNag-0001b3-Cx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Feb 2016 18:09:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:46831) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aQNag-0001ar-95 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Feb 2016 18:09:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aQNaf-0008Ma-T6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Feb 2016 18:09:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Paul Eggert Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2016 23:09:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22086 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 22086-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22086.145436811032107 (code B ref 22086); Mon, 01 Feb 2016 23:09:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 22086) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Feb 2016 23:08:30 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55420 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aQNaA-0008Ln-AI for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Feb 2016 18:08:30 -0500 Original-Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([131.179.128.68]:34177) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aQNa7-0008La-WE for 22086@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Feb 2016 18:08:28 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A5CF160522; Mon, 1 Feb 2016 15:08:21 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id fSRBCvh7QMlG; Mon, 1 Feb 2016 15:08:19 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF50D160F56; Mon, 1 Feb 2016 15:08:19 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at zimbra.cs.ucla.edu Original-Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id 1MUwuSLdm4c3; Mon, 1 Feb 2016 15:08:19 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from penguin.cs.ucla.edu (Penguin.CS.UCLA.EDU [131.179.64.200]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A5ADE160522; Mon, 1 Feb 2016 15:08:19 -0800 (PST) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0 In-Reply-To: <83y4b4z0f2.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:112232 Archived-At: On 02/01/2016 11:38 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: Wolfgang Jenkner >> Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2016 19:34:20 +0100 >> >> >> Also, I get an only slightly larger number when dumping bootstrap-emacs >> with the pre-compiled elisp files. Perhaps, you got the first number >> with the *.elc files still being around from a previous test? Yes, that's probably it. Though I'm still surprised by the discrepancy. The biggest .el file is not that big. Is Emacs reading all the .el files into memory, into a single Emacs instance that buffers all the .el files at once? > You guys are aware that the amount of memory used when dumping depends > on such factors as the length of the absolute file name of the > directory where you build Emacs, right? Oh yes. Even doing the exact same dump twice can yield different results, presumably due to ASLR.