From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#22241: 25.0.50; etags Ruby parser problems Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2016 00:43:21 +0300 Message-ID: <56A3F3F9.8030404@yandex.ru> References: <86r3i9hnbt.fsf@yandex.ru> <83si1o45g1.fsf@gnu.org> <56A3C53D.1050408@yandex.ru> <83oacc3yx7.fsf@gnu.org> <56A3D47E.3030802@yandex.ru> <83mvrw3tuj.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1453585462 27847 80.91.229.3 (23 Jan 2016 21:44:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2016 21:44:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 22241@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 23 22:44:11 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aN5yc-0007Tq-2b for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 23 Jan 2016 22:44:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58612 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aN5yb-0006ZG-Ch for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 23 Jan 2016 16:44:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51324) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aN5yY-0006Yn-2h for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Jan 2016 16:44:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aN5yU-0002N0-Po for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Jan 2016 16:44:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:44386) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aN5yU-0002Mg-M4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Jan 2016 16:44:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aN5yU-0008DD-9r for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Jan 2016 16:44:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dmitry Gutov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2016 21:44:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22241 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 22241-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22241.145358541031524 (code B ref 22241); Sat, 23 Jan 2016 21:44:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 22241) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Jan 2016 21:43:30 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60839 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aN5xy-0008CO-Hi for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 23 Jan 2016 16:43:30 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-lf0-f48.google.com ([209.85.215.48]:35304) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aN5xw-0008C7-SJ for 22241@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 23 Jan 2016 16:43:29 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-lf0-f48.google.com with SMTP id c192so65493415lfe.2 for <22241@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 23 Jan 2016 13:43:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=93hq/N6lNrkNtbuRxM4YdnGi8pVDYimVPk7J0Sc7NCk=; b=BeStKLLEp4GGbMpEAG7fZFD0nk5h+ky1Njq6sE+OdE7Kg7HPt9iMnGVdSP2TZ2jmcr mUotV9hPsQIXSpb9iHsssxqKA5+MfrO146P6mDSP+HGI4iXiztq0+fKRALj1SzK70g67 E3+BUBwfKwYcRznO4mCOiMfG3MZUO8M9MjLgp+t+SchwB52lEl+xOvKHgnuRN9x7NoBI QNW77jSJJQ0knAewOkmXqfR1xnrtiR3GheWwFpHm7B3ZZ8FwF7162eTmFPawmOZtsVEJ LAVmR1qJTgGCHAutpptlg+1nl455Grd/Pwlng9rEENedcRpt8NnLI4qvcDM3//LeDfcN 1I6A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=93hq/N6lNrkNtbuRxM4YdnGi8pVDYimVPk7J0Sc7NCk=; b=XKXjpLBHQ7INFwqeh7rRFQzEJR8DaJksiJbn0sZKe9egNQ+pd9hJl3Es89UC88RlIB jCdyx3ogN5GYGssK56Z8agAZ6eiETluIjS6SvbgH74aWeeSytudlJ62IHUnieMIByoTE saqrtqMbUDhgoQuxE0UJitcJV+h1cRBL8hl3+ywOk+Dod2YDpVjVXYwNAuSTv7yWQlud gW5uv8MTsRd5F8oYGEDy3ZgzyrMDnAD1eZXrn74hxkTeveCAhH5U4XUsEWJfowjpAq5K RCv5+ZxII59i1PqxjPtsOJP/BXDQDu8VyvLzw+UR74UiVWuFZpGXSdYd30yE9uObjrvM FZiw== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOQzaoPOQ6n2XqsTugQBXFffp/MF9E25WnKwJ8KJNsbSo+U02kSUW91PDKhoinhtDw== X-Received: by 10.25.157.135 with SMTP id g129mr3568919lfe.45.1453585402765; Sat, 23 Jan 2016 13:43:22 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.190] ([178.252.127.222]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id l67sm1739007lfi.2.2016.01.23.13.43.21 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 23 Jan 2016 13:43:21 -0800 (PST) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:44.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/44.0 In-Reply-To: <83mvrw3tuj.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:111900 Archived-At: On 01/23/2016 11:48 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> ^[ \t]([A-Z][a-z0-9_])[ \t]*=[ \t]* ^ I missed a * there. >> ? Then record the first group, and simply don't look at what's being >> assigned. > > That's possible, but is it good enough? Does the above regexp > necessarily mean it's a constant? I think so. The important point is that its name begins with a capital letter. And we should probably recognize assignments like these: ModuleExample::CONSTANT = 5 The qualified name "ModuleExample::CONSTANT" if at the top level, unqualified name is "CONSTANT". When inside classes, modules or methods, only record the unqualified name; maybe disregard these assignments when inside methods altogether. Thanks in advance.