From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jim Porter Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#64866: 30.0.50; Emacsclient block for 2 seconds when error is raised from command Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2023 22:34:11 -0700 Message-ID: <569eed52-7d21-87be-b177-87b9e987d2ce@gmail.com> References: <83y1j3o158.fsf@gnu.org> <837cqmo6ew.fsf@gnu.org> <5243ab88-9045-2ca4-db50-32ad13de0330@gmail.com> <83zg3im03a.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="2403"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 64866@debbugs.gnu.org, yikai@z1k.dev To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Jul 27 07:51:43 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qOtuX-0000N5-EA for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 27 Jul 2023 07:51:41 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qOteT-00043C-TY; Thu, 27 Jul 2023 01:35:05 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qOteR-00042s-9J for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Jul 2023 01:35:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qOteQ-0006Zo-T5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Jul 2023 01:35:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qOteQ-0005Pg-JE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Jul 2023 01:35:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Jim Porter Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2023 05:35:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 64866 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 64866-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B64866.169043606020758 (code B ref 64866); Thu, 27 Jul 2023 05:35:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 64866) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Jul 2023 05:34:20 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40525 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qOtdj-0005Ok-Pc for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 27 Jul 2023 01:34:20 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pj1-x102e.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::102e]:52267) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qOtdh-0005OW-VV for 64866@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 27 Jul 2023 01:34:18 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pj1-x102e.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-267f870e6ffso357254a91.0 for <64866@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 26 Jul 2023 22:34:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1690436052; x=1691040852; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language :references:cc:to:subject:mime-version:date:message-id:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=JURr5eKIlbgbK1dfLmyM7Ri7ytmhX6hmwHYrivysgtA=; b=EVlUu0fZZ2OVA9fqsqq4MDqwFbyw8KrgEgY21N9HKkxPY/hfJEd9oLIv946migxJJv te5g69m1dnlBDEpt2XHlG7jodAHnIeH0RPxTZ5onDTKArcJgLRLe+A6R4wP9svUjb/w+ E/S/zk2Y3WqibEAaes8a3DuWy/3dmojQiGD7imb8usHJNtzEymi3zeUy93jYOuIgEGr2 5IqqnvVDD3B15zNTB4OI0RlCWn9M1HHJ3j3pG9zOfIIFLF3r3/RPowSHTbb0+KPYW3HQ vxLKaQ90F4ZXk3+Os+0BIVRr07qw31BSNEjcND8l6MqFUjOOiFquClXltaXUrNhAsFw4 sTEg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1690436052; x=1691040852; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language :references:cc:to:subject:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=JURr5eKIlbgbK1dfLmyM7Ri7ytmhX6hmwHYrivysgtA=; b=L37ps0LA3F0xveHDYauQRU9033wHREQcdOWI2F6T6JnHx1rXv7uAlJlMBj42wjopwd hGxmbv4XBUtWaZTuDBsyOfloBKCb19Z6oErsk66sDMINizGl9MDUufXP03OMW+wL0aOB n9jgJZeKOoQH39iHqjK3V5Ls2kcuGjNKQ+0codVEJzpgTdww8O83Oe6jidobYH11SQ6z 002esvONmFs81G4NNXC4CAJOHjWr3o+TzMmtxgBwwldrkXuizG7xy9l07MS5CNHpEBI2 3l2/jAEBtVLyf7Z1whqI43zHBPl7m/okqsqQSeaR3Cb3dbHlDIAUke4sFBqYlKWFEdxi SMLQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ABy/qLYyj+JE7KkbT6kdPMr874vfzpVNuaI1SRMeMy1EbR4Rv+vqntuD oFRuKCZSDUJ80vMSDRgpugtRHgeX9Qw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APBJJlHd614UNMHDSbgA79/XO+9MfQGJ5m/gktscvlMiupcNdl2yG8DFdMUu3K7c3Ew9BZK3XHtr7Q== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:ba94:b0:260:e256:27c7 with SMTP id t20-20020a17090aba9400b00260e25627c7mr3296003pjr.15.1690436052000; Wed, 26 Jul 2023 22:34:12 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.2] (cpe-76-168-148-233.socal.res.rr.com. [76.168.148.233]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id 7-20020a17090a034700b0026852d886fcsm2179823pjf.36.2023.07.26.22.34.11 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 26 Jul 2023 22:34:11 -0700 (PDT) Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <83zg3im03a.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:266159 Archived-At: On 7/26/2023 9:48 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2023 12:48:38 -0700 >> Cc: 64866@debbugs.gnu.org, yikai@z1k.dev >> From: Jim Porter >> >> On 7/26/2023 11:48 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >>> Why did you think it should? According to its documentation it only >>> affects minibuffer-message. The 2-sec delay in the above case is done >>> by an explicit call to sit-for with a hard-coded argument of 2 sec. >>> See server-return-error. >> >> Thanks for the pointer to this code. Looking at it, it doesn't seem easy >> to avoid this delay without causing the problems that you've mentioned. > > Yes, see bug#63629 for the problems that code attempts to solve. Thanks. I'll take a look at that in more detail in the next week or so, since at this point I'm just curious as to whether there's a way to get the best of both worlds. (At minimum, maybe I can add a regression test.)