From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#1452: Acknowledgement (23.0.60; Problem with nextstep, longlines-mode,) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2016 03:53:29 +0200 Message-ID: <568C7399.8060703@yandex.ru> References: <20081129.145347.35808910.hanche@math.ntnu.no> <20081129.155222.124907962.hanche@math.ntnu.no> <20081129.161126.71259916.hanche@math.ntnu.no> <5vy4c46ifr.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <83oacz5188.fsf@gnu.org> <568C3AA1.5050903@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1452045273 3197 80.91.229.3 (6 Jan 2016 01:54:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2016 01:54:33 +0000 (UTC) Cc: hanche@math.ntnu.no, 1452@debbugs.gnu.org To: Andrew Hyatt , John Wiegley Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 06 02:54:17 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aGdIl-0005m4-Cs for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 06 Jan 2016 02:54:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52206 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aGdIh-0004hi-M0 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 05 Jan 2016 20:54:11 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53006) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aGdId-0004hL-TK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jan 2016 20:54:08 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aGdIY-0006ie-R4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jan 2016 20:54:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:51086) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aGdIY-0006ia-NU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jan 2016 20:54:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aGdIY-0002NM-Fk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jan 2016 20:54:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dmitry Gutov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2016 01:54:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 1452 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: wontfix Original-Received: via spool by 1452-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B1452.14520452199101 (code B ref 1452); Wed, 06 Jan 2016 01:54:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 1452) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Jan 2016 01:53:39 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39306 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aGdIB-0002Mj-Et for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jan 2016 20:53:39 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-lb0-f195.google.com ([209.85.217.195]:36746) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aGdI9-0002MW-A7 for 1452@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jan 2016 20:53:37 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-lb0-f195.google.com with SMTP id ti8so19498015lbb.3 for <1452@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 05 Jan 2016 17:53:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=8nmXS2x310CDK8Tg9/W/DpBo9sUNoE1nKld3T6x9xGc=; b=HV3MlG++T24AQD/F1Dhdr3MrOD4xwXEncqPOrDZMmOiWxdh05VaIbCzTgYx1MUZ8c/ BF2LmqSeHhqZ6w8jKa60bo9TgKapkBHve6hIIYA2EtSG69De8GTMdzkjT6WFkf0PUIen 8C3yFpYNAs+Z97/8wSz3t30ESIEbGZkxDefmzewMTWn4FvaRF36NgOVM9Y0NhG1FPdO4 0L6lFC4otgzR88E4zAYHw6Qi8Y/pBvhN6zg7TzW38G44YFZ8bHTQ9LzjNtqXY9LOYAio lLoiUHqtfyc1Tcfn7FRhxIlDPVN8wFLmR3bW8ameF/HJN/2S6yTFXmlNt6sgkcPQ+xlU sfbA== X-Received: by 10.112.168.5 with SMTP id zs5mr9865907lbb.56.1452045211429; Tue, 05 Jan 2016 17:53:31 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.190] ([178.252.127.222]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id zu7sm6680434lbb.36.2016.01.05.17.53.30 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 05 Jan 2016 17:53:30 -0800 (PST) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:43.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/43.0 In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:111282 Archived-At: On 01/06/2016 03:47 AM, Andrew Hyatt wrote: > But what would it mean to maintain an obsolete package? My guess is > that this just means putting it in ELPA, considering all bugs closed, > and being willing to accept patches to fix any issues that anyone is > interested in fixing. I believe it would mean putting it in ELPA, un-obsoleting, and eventually working towards fixing the known bugs, and well as any new ones. It's okay if the new maintainer doesn't make fixing the older bugs the first priority, but closing them, if the package becomes maintained again, doesn't make sense to me.