From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#22083: 25.0.50; hg: adding tag enhances the rev, modeline does not reflect Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2015 16:43:47 +0200 Message-ID: <5661A6A3.2020108@yandex.ru> References: <87h9jzy70u.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <566103DA.2050901@yandex.ru> <83610eioei.fsf@gnu.org> <56617BDD.5040605@yandex.ru> <83oae6gugl.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1449240263 18958 80.91.229.3 (4 Dec 2015 14:44:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2015 14:44:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 22083@debbugs.gnu.org, oub@mat.ucm.es To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 04 15:44:12 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1a4ral-0005RQ-I2 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 04 Dec 2015 15:44:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41347 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a4rak-0007ZG-Um for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 04 Dec 2015 09:44:10 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47602) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a4rag-0007Ys-V2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Dec 2015 09:44:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a4rac-0002Bo-Mh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Dec 2015 09:44:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:48783) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a4rac-0002Bk-Jo for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Dec 2015 09:44:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1a4rac-0006ll-Dt for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Dec 2015 09:44:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dmitry Gutov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2015 14:44:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22083 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 22083-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22083.144924023325998 (code B ref 22083); Fri, 04 Dec 2015 14:44:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 22083) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Dec 2015 14:43:53 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38491 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1a4raT-0006lG-3A for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 04 Dec 2015 09:43:53 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wm0-f45.google.com ([74.125.82.45]:34877) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1a4raR-0006l7-2d for 22083@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 04 Dec 2015 09:43:51 -0500 Original-Received: by wmuu63 with SMTP id u63so64705485wmu.0 for <22083@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 04 Dec 2015 06:43:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ZQ1XUhog+M58JYbmmz1miP90jVmHNUXfLHAPsU+/xE8=; b=TJ0x00uScImOZ8SOT14MFjogHlWLTctptkQ1D5ZEH0qzjkl0bqy+fNdbNo0Z9fipzk +/74DUgCPoG1IC3oeNYkPUl2ajf2vOxYVoibqDgcB4PP17ZYF3QcJNJRZc1VYMOP1x5F SEfkn0Rh5Mhs3KBLYOD6KuAmbUG+8RKYQRpEqpnVDArNrOhrlcUzwTpVP/ndDGh0dkCX ZR8TJ1Pcn9HcccFQS0fubbIHjzHgAuolDpU5EnrVJvYLoWeykEEI6rGEHfLoOSOJp8zJ bwb0SGJ15o4mxpsLhvRuKDUcoL7mJrkkqk68GpB6TQefSMuTYtQljtoae6pw4xEa4+jZ cuTw== X-Received: by 10.194.109.169 with SMTP id ht9mr17910835wjb.13.1449240230345; Fri, 04 Dec 2015 06:43:50 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [10.9.0.103] (nat.webazilla.com. [78.140.128.228]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id h5sm12398601wjz.21.2015.12.04.06.43.48 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 04 Dec 2015 06:43:49 -0800 (PST) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:42.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/42.0 In-Reply-To: <83oae6gugl.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:109585 Archived-At: On 12/04/2015 04:27 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > Suit yourself, but (a) it's different from every other VCS supported > by VC, Maybe because VC as a framework isn't really aware of branches, and that notion is fairly different among the backends. But if it turns out that Hg tags are the same as Git branches, or Hg has a corresponding notion of branches, I think we should show them. Whether it is together with the revision number, or instead, should be decided by someone who uses Hg. > and (b) every Git expert always tells me that the branch is not > important at all in Git. That sounds like a poor rephrasing. Would you consider it unimportant if you commit and push a change to emacs-25, when you intended to push it to master?