From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#15599: [PATCH] Inferior Lisp Mode Menu Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 03:20:18 -0400 Message-ID: <561snf83x.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> References: <20131012170846.GA688@jo.hnanthony.com> <20131023214701.GA8211@jo.hnanthony.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1382599269 20530 80.91.229.3 (24 Oct 2013 07:21:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 07:21:09 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 15599@debbugs.gnu.org To: John Anthony Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 24 09:21:13 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VZFEH-0000iv-7P for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 24 Oct 2013 09:21:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52913 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VZFEG-0007nJ-OH for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 24 Oct 2013 03:21:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44277) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VZFEC-0007nD-5u for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Oct 2013 03:21:09 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VZFE7-0005Pk-Cl for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Oct 2013 03:21:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:54274) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VZFE7-0005Pg-9I for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Oct 2013 03:21:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VZFE6-00030O-DK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Oct 2013 03:21:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 07:21:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 15599 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 15599-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B15599.138259922411499 (code B ref 15599); Thu, 24 Oct 2013 07:21:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 15599) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Oct 2013 07:20:24 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40059 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VZFDS-0002zO-Rm for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 24 Oct 2013 03:20:23 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:46066 ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VZFDP-0002zF-Mk for 15599@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 24 Oct 2013 03:20:20 -0400 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VZFDO-0006zU-MC; Thu, 24 Oct 2013 03:20:18 -0400 X-Spook: White Water JSOFC3IP Majic Capricorn assassinate ASO X-Ran: \z;yso3|FeJeNX"aQQ*qF[rt75OVH#O(Al%IA#^LRW[!=Mfl/S:]#nXW{.=\1F_!m"Qb?7 X-Hue: magenta X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: <20131023214701.GA8211@jo.hnanthony.com> (John Anthony's message of "Wed, 23 Oct 2013 22:47:01 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:79576 Archived-At: John Anthony wrote: > A quick question of style before I submit a patch with your > suggestions applied; should I check that a user is going to use a menu > option correctly and, if not, disable it? Sometimes yes, sometimes no. Eg it makes sense to me that "Cut" and "Copy" in the "Edit" menu are disabled when there is no active region. > To use a working example, should I disable "Eval Last Sexp" in the > menu if the cursor is not positioned after a valid sexp? But that seems like too much. I'd leave such an item always enabled.