From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#20977: 24.5; Hi Lock Mode fails with "Invalid pattern list expression" Date: Sun, 05 Jul 2015 12:57:01 +0200 Message-ID: <55990D7D.7040303@gmx.at> References: <5597B6B8.3010307@gmail.com> <871tgoou9o.fsf@web.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1436093902 29871 80.91.229.3 (5 Jul 2015 10:58:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2015 10:58:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 20977@debbugs.gnu.org To: Michael Heerdegen , Raffaele Ricciardi Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jul 05 12:58:11 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZBhcg-0001eL-5k for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 05 Jul 2015 12:58:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46295 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZBhcf-0003Rk-MN for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 05 Jul 2015 06:58:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50568) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZBhcc-0003Rc-Ie for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Jul 2015 06:58:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZBhcY-0004JP-Jm for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Jul 2015 06:58:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:38728) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZBhcY-0004JL-Fz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Jul 2015 06:58:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZBhcY-00012p-5q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Jul 2015 06:58:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 05 Jul 2015 10:58:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 20977 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 20977-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B20977.14360938393940 (code B ref 20977); Sun, 05 Jul 2015 10:58:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 20977) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Jul 2015 10:57:19 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40171 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZBhbq-00011T-Ed for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 05 Jul 2015 06:57:18 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.18]:65318) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZBhbo-00011C-Ou for 20977@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 05 Jul 2015 06:57:17 -0400 Original-Received: from [188.22.39.250] ([188.22.39.250]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LqhmM-1YYoM82wyo-00eMhm; Sun, 05 Jul 2015 12:57:10 +0200 In-Reply-To: <871tgoou9o.fsf@web.de> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:TX665G+BeWyAEZD1Xw2XQbDJ0Ah0h7ylD9f8dinbpX7vlpZASl0 IJoptZRtVWm6tyg5cY+kSn6WY1kjScmCNVJKu2kbKwqJbkQ3VWNqnTnBWArrvF/wCV4Kv3a 5xYSAZTIVgBqMb/KHKSVv3tXbSGzUytk/x9G5sVYqUG8JDuDGKZgUqf4NznfChdaug+wvYh ++fzrPSEhbp7w127uaxrg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:DrxhsoozoF8=:a5PYosLfRzIE3ZiJYp4r8u xlAA/zHeXL0RwBo/ZLZnfLRLa2sGNuI7J48e436IoafFpm7PGQe21F7mgq83Oqz44IP0mhBba gvEifN/bRBLHlReoBONTGOug82IfeoTiTW34X2kAEuCXFWJC+F/oQHW8Flx2h1dml9di2Wefr nwBkB24wpl+IZRnR8SZ+lOgHbxtbQO/He3BApTuCJu4ZGgfTruVudzs+izQDlGy9Vg1Hc/Ed4 SC6A1djAvyRXcg1nH9EFo8M74K1NvQsMN2V/h4w2FRyTjosI6P4HMrYvdQvFTWEVSMJiBNx6C mWxLQX1MWQNDRQT/4jAF/L1ZWQDUC0xoP/YnMIryR2I3Ltl4r38v+UKQ53sn+g6mHU84R6pZV +f8Ot/IvAV1365axxpeRuquzpHCH9bQyDMwMN3waH4fJRWeFc6e6KaJ/yGxfmnq5dXsAM77V5 A9Xj+IBL/MtMw5J8MNq7F0gGmyDOmyqffqG5rNCr/mUsN93bqk+lKm+Jfo9uusCPVx7BNc9tg ryflbeDuVzlrqAfAGWyN3fvigYpJYDcfDwu3DPQ2dtCX6teuk/B3vglbUYW+PLgQFOcBR0D+g rBphvawl9G2RItnyAoTEohvNRi5coLoLdWtHavFlISUGo3jC12hJ5oKEz8ySlKuuddnavqryn B/csooitMxJsD/egIaDCsUSKeUE5JNCVtBoazfWSXO78iIpOKPz9jaa6MpwBjdCEOcFY= X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:104726 Archived-At: > FWIW I can live with this message in this special case, > though I agree that it is confusing. I suppose we could write something like When hi-lock is started and if the mode is not excluded or patterns rejected, the beginning of the buffer is searched for lines of the form: Hi-lock: (FOO BAR) where FOO and BAR are patterns. but I don't know what `hi-lock-mode' patterns should look like and how that mode works. If anyone does, please apply a patch so we can close this. martin