From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#20629: 25.0.50; Regression: TAGS broken, can't find anything in C++ files. Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 02:56:02 +0300 Message-ID: <55650812.60909@yandex.ru> References: <555EC552.5010600@swipnet.se> <55606A8F.1020109@swipnet.se> <55606CC7.3010401@yandex.ru> <55606F70.10605@swipnet.se> <83twv31jzg.fsf@gnu.org> <83pp5r1hdx.fsf@gnu.org> <83mw0v1e5n.fsf@gnu.org> <83lhgczo16.fsf@gnu.org> <55639175.9090005@yandex.ru> <83fv6kysjf.fsf@gnu.org> <556447EF.3050103@yandex.ru> <83bnh7z8c5.fsf@gnu.org> <5564C2C7.5050909@yandex.ru> <837frvywfn.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1432684647 16818 80.91.229.3 (26 May 2015 23:57:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 23:57:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 20629@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed May 27 01:57:13 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YxOif-0002wW-2D for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 27 May 2015 01:57:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50717 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YxOie-00076Z-9Q for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 26 May 2015 19:57:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59894) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YxOia-00076U-Ul for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 26 May 2015 19:57:09 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YxOiV-0000nb-5W for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 26 May 2015 19:57:08 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:47554) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YxOiV-0000nT-2B for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 26 May 2015 19:57:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YxOiU-0000LQ-HW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 26 May 2015 19:57:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dmitry Gutov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 23:57:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 20629 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 20629-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B20629.14326845731264 (code B ref 20629); Tue, 26 May 2015 23:57:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 20629) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 May 2015 23:56:13 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57529 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YxOhg-0000KJ-R5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 26 May 2015 19:56:13 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wi0-f181.google.com ([209.85.212.181]:38539) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YxOhe-0000K5-B3 for 20629@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 26 May 2015 19:56:11 -0400 Original-Received: by wizo1 with SMTP id o1so2202375wiz.1 for <20629@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 26 May 2015 16:56:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=s+dtlxegSh8jRpyslINhSGUS7uT4cQCZyMUa0fm2X+g=; b=VgdN42Gw1nEKEQq9Sm3QHuUmZl3fAJ5PSEsHTOf22W+y5dSAcn7gVE20E8HChFu14h DNO9jMblVww5VqhTyVZpX2Q89UVPnA793aj8rFpw/AS8e7GdIHjheKTiIE+Gv9ESOppn N3ZpG6QuyhtyMp6E59BiEKJkLR9WN4mRaRsT6hBLnCz8EklA09QsA8FjTGfwUoXz9pQE kFjgb3FmbfZ1rFlFZNtwsK61wIeoToobWMa467r6IPjPoZF77GgKCZQmzLPynV55lD7r qj4Prf6j7OUcRFrF7M2wh8pGwonbAj63jGgmePmN0A1f+pJCVQ4/oC33MM/mI5JwUhtQ 9D9g== X-Received: by 10.194.200.194 with SMTP id ju2mr52377320wjc.61.1432684564537; Tue, 26 May 2015 16:56:04 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.2] ([82.102.93.54]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id z12sm24047912wjq.12.2015.05.26.16.56.03 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 26 May 2015 16:56:04 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.0 In-Reply-To: <837frvywfn.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:103199 Archived-At: On 05/26/2015 10:23 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > I don't see how that could be possible: tag-implicit-name-match-p is > language-agnostic. You'd need to make it language-aware before it > could do such stuff for languages that need it. Well, by including ()=,; in that constant, it already makes certain assumptions that aren't necessarily true (for instance, `=' can be, and often is, a part of a method name in Ruby). Adding a colon would be another one of those. Not that I necessarily advocate for it, mind you. > It slips my mind for a moment, but there's some command whose > completion shows for functions, for variables, etc. elisp-completion-at-point can do that. > And it's not the only one, I'm quite sure I saw longer text after each > candidate, perhaps somewhere in 'company'? That's possible. But either way, these are annotations for existing completions. What the suggested patch would do, though, is add new completions. > What kind of junk? Among patterns for tags with explicit names, there could be some odd ones. We never showed them before, I think, anywhere. You should try the patch and see how it goes.