From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#20527: 24.5; [w32] resizing window from bottom-left/top-right corner causes broken resizing Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 12:08:53 +0200 Message-ID: <55507FB5.7080507@gmx.at> References: <834mnoqnim.fsf@gnu.org> <554F4F7C.1060903@gmx.at> <838ucwo5j7.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1431339029 828 80.91.229.3 (11 May 2015 10:10:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 10:10:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: vladimir@pobox.com, 20527@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon May 11 12:10:20 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YrkfD-0005XR-Km for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 11 May 2015 12:10:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36350 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YrkfC-00066n-Lm for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 11 May 2015 06:10:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51229) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yrkf5-00066O-6V for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 11 May 2015 06:10:15 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yrkf0-0008J1-85 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 11 May 2015 06:10:11 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:58850) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yrkf0-0008Iu-5S for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 11 May 2015 06:10:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Yrkez-0001LG-E8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 11 May 2015 06:10:05 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 10:10:04 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 20527 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 20527-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B20527.14313389505083 (code B ref 20527); Mon, 11 May 2015 10:10:04 +0000 Original-Received: (at 20527) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 May 2015 10:09:10 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40592 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Yrke6-0001Ju-8a for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 May 2015 06:09:10 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.21]:60468) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Yrke4-0001Jf-MZ for 20527@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 May 2015 06:09:09 -0400 Original-Received: from [88.117.58.212] ([88.117.58.212]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MK3bN-1Yt7YT1NZt-001VOh; Mon, 11 May 2015 12:08:56 +0200 In-Reply-To: <838ucwo5j7.fsf@gnu.org> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:v3+Y+QD98nzmMxRchwv/527RMD8QbcEEZLOHotwkUEaaTKTOR5M 0ByqWKY52jmqlEODyYWj559R5GtI0W87bU0w0+8bmt0MJmYR7uLqMp8KgVrrVbNOOSzQKdM XMGo2OETLfqfs2Aw0WyS2TmuZ2stmPGb3o+KKMA0csbdvlz98Qz1kwkkNFIipDN+ndYa8kr 2yfRQdWAsV9C2teexydHw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:102658 Archived-At: > What the screencast shows is that when you move the lower-left edge of > the frame, the upper-right edge moves as well, as if each character of > change in the size caused by your dragging gets _another_ character of > change that causes the other side to move. Strange indeed. I never trusted the code in WM_WINDOWPOSCHANGING. martin