From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#20445: excessive redisplay / echo area resizing during byte-compilation Date: Fri, 01 May 2015 12:41:56 +0200 Message-ID: <55435874.4080806@gmx.at> References: <7cfv7lxnpr.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <83sibkuvze.fsf@gnu.org> <83r3r3szgt.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1430477006 17227 80.91.229.3 (1 May 2015 10:43:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 1 May 2015 10:43:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 20445 <20445@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bruce.connor.am@gmail.com, Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri May 01 12:43:15 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Yo8PZ-0005Ou-Fh for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 May 2015 12:43:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53510 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yo8PY-0008Br-PJ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 May 2015 06:43:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45147) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yo8PU-0008Bc-3Z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 01 May 2015 06:43:09 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yo8PO-00062a-Vm for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 01 May 2015 06:43:08 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:48154) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yo8PO-00062Q-T4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 01 May 2015 06:43:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Yo8PO-00061f-KN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 01 May 2015 06:43:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 01 May 2015 10:43:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 20445 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 20445-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B20445.143047693323096 (code B ref 20445); Fri, 01 May 2015 10:43:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 20445) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 May 2015 10:42:13 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58128 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Yo8Oa-00060R-To for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 01 May 2015 06:42:13 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.18]:52189) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Yo8OZ-00060D-9z for 20445@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 01 May 2015 06:42:11 -0400 Original-Received: from [88.117.112.225] ([88.117.112.225]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MOf5S-1Yt4bU270A-0065fe; Fri, 01 May 2015 12:42:02 +0200 In-Reply-To: X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:Lzf8erEULZjQQz99L4S7z/doXx6549M5MtLzNo2l9Q9XXQie6d4 IMfjyoRhUxMwOjCj3/YycccfwJgZk5tHDGKBEsI/WadqMMlUL5+dlBt4zy45+iSf5F7p5T9 qACz8fh9WU0jqmR8VGcZLuKRtcKKrS2OiuNpzlHoRGY6Imm1wchR/V4DUH3PyQblqiNd3xC jGaV1jQnNPJ0Stn4+VZ3g== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:102320 Archived-At: > On the oher hand, it would be nice to have a way of preventing the > compilation buffer from popping up. Why? martin