unofficial mirror of bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: martin rudalics <rudalics@gmx.at>
To: Tassilo Horn <tsdh@gnu.org>, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: 20189@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#20189: 25.0.50; Feature request: Alternative split-window-sensibly functions
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 09:24:07 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <551270A7.5070601@gmx.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <871tkd36jx.fsf@gnu.org>

 > Are explicitly created windows treated any differently than explicitly
 > created windows?

Now that's a difficult question ...

One thing `display-buffer' sets up is the 'quit-restore' window
parameter which determines the future behavior of `quit-window'.
C-x 2 and C-x 3 don't do that.

martin





  reply	other threads:[~2015-03-25  8:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-24  9:18 bug#20189: 25.0.50; Feature request: Alternative split-window-sensibly functions Tassilo Horn
2015-03-24 10:51 ` martin rudalics
2015-03-24 11:39   ` Tassilo Horn
2015-03-24 13:30     ` martin rudalics
2015-03-24 14:59       ` Tassilo Horn
2015-03-25  8:23         ` martin rudalics
2015-03-25  9:41           ` Tassilo Horn
2015-03-26 10:58             ` martin rudalics
2015-03-26 11:01             ` Tassilo Horn
2015-03-26 13:47               ` martin rudalics
2015-03-26 14:18                 ` Stefan Monnier
2015-03-26 14:31                   ` martin rudalics
2015-03-27 18:26                     ` Stefan Monnier
2015-03-26 15:15                 ` Tassilo Horn
2015-03-26 16:04                   ` martin rudalics
2015-03-24 17:05 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-03-25  7:00   ` Tassilo Horn
2015-03-25  8:24     ` martin rudalics [this message]
2015-03-25 17:25     ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-03-25 19:33       ` Tassilo Horn
2015-03-25 19:38         ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-03-26  4:27           ` Tassilo Horn
2015-03-26 10:58             ` martin rudalics
2015-03-26 16:29             ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-03-25  8:23   ` martin rudalics

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=551270A7.5070601@gmx.at \
    --to=rudalics@gmx.at \
    --cc=20189@debbugs.gnu.org \
    --cc=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=tsdh@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).