From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#20189: 25.0.50; Feature request: Alternative split-window-sensibly functions Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 14:30:06 +0100 Message-ID: <551166DE.9070007@gmx.at> References: <87iodqbvoz.fsf@gnu.org> <551141AC.40003@gmx.at> <87egoebp60.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1427203938 10998 80.91.229.3 (24 Mar 2015 13:32:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 13:32:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 20189@debbugs.gnu.org To: Tassilo Horn Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 24 14:32:06 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YaOvS-0002Ds-Mt for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 14:31:22 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60795 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YaOvR-0006fC-VT for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 09:31:21 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50412) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YaOvK-0006Zs-98 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 09:31:19 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YaOvC-0003Ja-Qx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 09:31:14 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:44898) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YaOvC-0003JW-Fy for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 09:31:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YaOvB-0005E9-SB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 09:31:06 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 13:31:05 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 20189 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 20189-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B20189.142720383420046 (code B ref 20189); Tue, 24 Mar 2015 13:31:05 +0000 Original-Received: (at 20189) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Mar 2015 13:30:34 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34673 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YaOue-0005DA-DW for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 09:30:33 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.15]:54149) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YaOuQ-0005CY-9e for 20189@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 09:30:19 -0400 Original-Received: from [178.191.139.166] ([178.191.139.166]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx002) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MVe87-1YztJF0kRz-00YvNh; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 14:30:10 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87egoebp60.fsf@gnu.org> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:CKAMik18UZ6Nn6XnPQt8xKWiXtNLm+yIEGge9lxcwt1Z0FSxzMt m5WnxNCaFRCRbWy4NAHNvLWU7P8ni5rvYUtjWe1MBoYlAOOrlLlJxGjyYXUUmI1UB8OgcBU 0DcTNAX/hZi8VrQGYH+ESb3KHzQ09vbozeLORHJCmQ9MXJNolIbpI0PN2lSQubjExNI/JmC pNmdg0aIRWsVCRjvWdHow== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:100883 Archived-At: >>> With that and a maximized frame of size 269x82, I'd eventually end up >>> with three side-by-side windows each of size 86x82. >> >> Interesting. What is your value of `window-combination-resize'? > > I didn't know that, so it has the default value nil. Then how comes you "eventually end up with three side-by-side windows each of size 86x82"? By default you should get one window with 135 columns and two windows with 67 columns, approximately. > Reading its docs I > get the impression that I want that to be t instead, and to have it > effective, I'd also need to set `window-combination-limit' to nil. > > But with > > (setq window-combination-resize t > window-combination-limit nil) ;; was window-size before > > and a single 269x82 window, I still get a horizontal split first > (forming a horizontal combination IIUC) and then a vertical split. Yes - these are unrelated. `split-window-sensibly' controls the "split-direction". I share most of your concerns. But I'm not sure though where to put a/the solution. martin