From: Yuri D'Elia <yuri.delia@eurac.edu>
To: martin rudalics <rudalics@gmx.at>, Jan D. <jan.h.d@swipnet.se>
Cc: 19990@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#19990: 24.4; Bad resizing interaction when WM ignores size hints
Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 11:53:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54F98714.10603@eurac.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54F9718B.8070409@gmx.at>
On 03/06/2015 10:21 AM, martin rudalics wrote:
> The OP said that:
>
> I force the emacs frame to take the height of the entire screen.
>
> So this looks like a fullheight frame to me without, apparently,
> explicitly specifying it as such.
I should have never said 'full screen height', since this keeps
confusing you. In my particular configuration, I have no window borders,
so two windows side-by-side will automatically fit the screen height.
This is *not* a special case for a tiling window manger.
A tiling window manager will force the frame to fit a screen region,
_possibly_ ignoring size hints. That's all there is to it. It does that
*intentionally*, since you can imagine that having gaps between the
tiles is just plainly annoying. In a side-by-side configuration, you
don't want gaps on the lower corner of the screen.
> Maybe the OP's problem is that the Window manager conceptually gives
> Emacs the full height of the screen and Gtk+ is not aware of that.
> Maybe also Gtk+ doesn't even understand fullheight. At least I can't
> detect an entry for it in GtkWindowPrivate which OTOH has a 'tiled'
> entry.
The problem with Gtk+ is that it tries to handle hints both on behalf of
the window manger and on the client. I have *no* clue of why it does
that. Maybe to handle TWM? Or more probably to handle the "Windows" port
which has no such feature?
The second issue with Gtk+ is that it notifies the application while
doing his own hint handling (or again, is that intentional?).
I would be perfectly happy to discuss this issue with Gtk+ folks, but I
remember that back in Gtk 1.3/2.0 days, many of my patches where
rejected since they fixed behavior that wasn't really intended "for the
common user", whatever that means. Gtk 3 seems to have regressed even
more in this area, so I just gave up in trying to argue.
To sum up, however, what about this:
Since we receive the first ConfigureNotify event with the unhinted
width/height, we *can* detect that the size hints have been ignored.
Couldn't we disable them at that point? This would fix Gtk+ trying to do
a reconfiguration attempt and remove the following two useless events.
This looks like a simple fix that would already improve the current
configuration, but I would need experience with the Mac/Win port to tell
if Gtk would fail in this scenario. Maybe an "ifdef X11" is required.
The question then becomes: would actually be possible to set the hints
immediately back on, so that in a further resize request the WM sees the
hints, but *without* having Gtk+ do it's mess? This would mean that we
would need to set the hints back on when the resize request has been
fully settled. Tricky. Setting them back-on on a further repaint/focus
in/out event is either too late or not enough.
As mentioned in my first request, this is a minor nuance fix for folks
with tiling window managers. My point is "can we handle it better?".
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-06 10:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-03 11:38 bug#19990: 24.4; Bad resizing interaction when WM ignores size hints Yuri D'Elia
2015-03-03 17:47 ` martin rudalics
2015-03-03 18:41 ` Yuri D'Elia
2015-03-04 18:45 ` martin rudalics
2015-03-04 18:53 ` Yuri D'Elia
2015-03-04 19:22 ` Jan D.
2015-03-04 19:30 ` Yuri D'Elia
2015-03-04 19:38 ` Yuri D'Elia
2015-03-04 21:18 ` Jan D.
2015-03-05 8:04 ` martin rudalics
2015-03-05 16:36 ` Jan D.
2015-03-05 18:15 ` martin rudalics
2015-03-06 6:03 ` Jan D.
2015-03-06 9:21 ` martin rudalics
2015-03-06 10:53 ` Yuri D'Elia [this message]
2015-03-06 17:05 ` Jan D.
2015-03-06 17:19 ` Yuri D'Elia
2015-03-06 18:54 ` martin rudalics
2015-03-06 17:00 ` Jan D.
2015-03-06 18:54 ` martin rudalics
2015-03-07 8:00 ` Jan D.
2015-03-05 8:04 ` martin rudalics
2020-02-29 18:05 ` Stefan Kangas
2020-03-01 21:24 ` Yuri D'Elia
2020-03-02 8:00 ` Stefan Kangas
2020-03-02 9:53 ` Yuri D'Elia
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54F98714.10603@eurac.edu \
--to=yuri.delia@eurac.edu \
--cc=19990@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=jan.h.d@swipnet.se \
--cc=rudalics@gmx.at \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).