From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#19988: 25.0.50; Drag events ending in different frame Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2015 09:06:10 +0100 Message-ID: <54F80E72.3040609@gmx.at> References: <87k2yycfwh.fsf@gnu.org> <54F72082.8080709@gmx.at> <87a8zs4g9c.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1425542850 32055 80.91.229.3 (5 Mar 2015 08:07:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2015 08:07:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 19988@debbugs.gnu.org To: Tassilo Horn Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 05 09:07:20 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YTQoQ-0007JG-QQ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Mar 2015 09:07:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49574 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YTQoP-0003lz-TS for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Mar 2015 03:07:17 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47750) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YTQoG-0003X8-Sg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Mar 2015 03:07:09 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YTQoB-0005y3-C4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Mar 2015 03:07:08 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:36982) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YTQoB-0005xy-8M for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Mar 2015 03:07:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YTQoB-0005j4-4L for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Mar 2015 03:07:03 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2015 08:07:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 19988 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 19988-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B19988.142554278621947 (code B ref 19988); Thu, 05 Mar 2015 08:07:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at 19988) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Mar 2015 08:06:26 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35546 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YTQnZ-0005hv-OH for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Mar 2015 03:06:25 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.20]:53723) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YTQnY-0005hj-Lt for 19988@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Mar 2015 03:06:25 -0500 Original-Received: from [62.47.255.182] ([62.47.255.182]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MUkxk-1Xxdki3jrA-00YBlc; Thu, 05 Mar 2015 09:06:17 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87a8zs4g9c.fsf@gnu.org> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:/iQf6b19fB5bqDolSwGTCHcU/oy56svictjUakJGZZwWcDogZAH iFGCm7i6czOYf2Rxe7+HumlMrgkCVzXlNGdWqiXxu67ec/vMQZ67ocTPpMi/OPmc0WBSPQT kFgDgLPnAGHIQsOVO3U1Uc5oW+t2dL0AKgamJb+glnmnOKxSPmFt0GsbaCcGfvLrdAf1865 hnfjhoui/J5sOeuaVgMdw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:100087 Archived-At: > Ok. I think that would still be a nice enhancement although not > pressing. It's tricky as I explained earlier. Emacs knows about the x/y-extents of its visible frames but has no idea about the Z order they appear in. So if you have two overlapping target frames, how would it know which one to choose? > At least your rewrite of my function isn't really obvious to > me and probably most users. Basically you should rewrite you function using mouse tracking. Mine is only a hack to work within the frame of what you wrote before. > And it also behaves wrongly in some > situations with overlapping frames. Expected. See above. martin