From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#17945: 24.4.50; vc-git-annotate-command is too slow Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 22:37:09 +0200 Message-ID: <54EE3275.6050402@yandex.ru> References: <8638egylnn.fsf@yandex.ru> <87oaojuxzy.fsf@wanadoo.es> <3i385vur8a.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <54ECE538.1070601@yandex.ru> <87wq35yjdn.fsf@wanadoo.es> <54EE0D4C.7020309@yandex.ru> <87bnkh9880.fsf@wanadoo.es> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1424896704 11868 80.91.229.3 (25 Feb 2015 20:38:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 20:38:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 17945@debbugs.gnu.org To: =?UTF-8?Q?=C3=93scar?= Fuentes Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 25 21:38:15 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YQiih-0004rO-Kh for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 21:38:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56289 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YQiig-0007kZ-Qr for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 15:38:10 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53588) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YQiid-0007hQ-Ap for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 15:38:08 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YQiiZ-00044J-9m for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 15:38:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:54481) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YQiiZ-00044F-4q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 15:38:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YQiiY-0003Mb-K8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 15:38:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dmitry Gutov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 20:38:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 17945 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 17945-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B17945.142489664412879 (code B ref 17945); Wed, 25 Feb 2015 20:38:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 17945) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Feb 2015 20:37:24 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58079 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YQihv-0003Le-HP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 15:37:23 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-we0-f177.google.com ([74.125.82.177]:34771) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YQihr-0003LL-FT for 17945@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 15:37:20 -0500 Original-Received: by wesq59 with SMTP id q59so6096048wes.1 for <17945@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 12:37:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=aR9QNpXrpr7wN53legD+4IeqPGpmlsdB2KxXIur+9vw=; b=CDFOAPeSEDibyJWnuLrn6wMSyxAjJYdrFREAhsZ+/1RxfVcjIb9lp/+bh1igMqeOKk j7QK1nrHlyMgnmq8t40KPOKM4lfL8xX6nOPyWTJALoJzGbM4FX1K+Vgt1p8nBikKFh0L qKcK0Cy25D3M5r4Jm9jfF3/0kXK09MKVvFUJBJtzdsSbR46XczKbS45ytA/TD9ICeuUk wNRKb4qS3jbiHWBdsEbh8d0bW9YgnE/llj6Oy3K8DBGY5G+K8WnEJItU54Z4ouxNAhPk QJ3FYpgHMMfYVB6aFwzGhZIKbV+LcUuJ8waApbs1rQwwbdPZOOeyPxJqktkQV8yMWE/s ytxQ== X-Received: by 10.180.75.108 with SMTP id b12mr3024959wiw.44.1424896633787; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 12:37:13 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.3] ([82.102.93.54]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id h11sm26670443wic.14.2015.02.25.12.37.12 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 25 Feb 2015 12:37:13 -0800 (PST) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:36.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/36.0 In-Reply-To: <87bnkh9880.fsf@wanadoo.es> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:99824 Archived-At: On 02/25/2015 08:06 PM, Óscar Fuentes wrote: > vc-switches does check `vc-annotate-switches' (as it checks > vc-OP-switches for any other OP and BACKEND), so we are hiding > information from the user. But there's no such user option. And if a variable with that name is created, well, the user stepped on something nobody asked them too. > The whole problem consists on a generic approach (vc-OP-switches) that > doesn't play nice for some (all?) OPs. So we either get rid of > `vc-OP-switches' entirely or warn the user about its pitfalls. I think in this case we can just as well avoid using `vc-switches' and reference `vc-git-annotate-switches' directly. > (Is there an OP where `vc-OP-switches' works well across more than two > supported backends?) vc-diff-switches works pretty well. The rest of -switches variables, though, look similarly suspicious to me. That's vc-checkin-switches, vc-checkout-switches and vc-register-switches.