From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#19721: 25.0.50; Mode-line not redrawn with expose events Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2015 19:09:35 +0100 Message-ID: <54CE6BDF.7070402@gmx.at> References: <83r3ubjk5q.fsf@gnu.org> <83lhkjjhsp.fsf@gnu.org> <54CDE912.7070209@gmx.at> <83pp9tiqm6.fsf@gnu.org> <54CE548E.5020605@gmx.at> <83a90xiltd.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1422814261 3490 80.91.229.3 (1 Feb 2015 18:11:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2015 18:11:01 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 19721@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 01 19:11:01 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YHyz6-0001pn-Pm for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 01 Feb 2015 19:11:00 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51392 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YHyz6-00066v-50 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 01 Feb 2015 13:11:00 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39254) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YHyyI-0005M2-Ho for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Feb 2015 13:10:13 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YHyyB-0003wm-4u for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Feb 2015 13:10:09 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:40328) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YHyyB-0003wS-2n for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Feb 2015 13:10:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YHyyA-0002Bm-6k for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Feb 2015 13:10:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2015 18:10:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 19721 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 19721-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B19721.14228141928394 (code B ref 19721); Sun, 01 Feb 2015 18:10:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 19721) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Feb 2015 18:09:52 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59801 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YHyy0-0002BJ-Dz for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 01 Feb 2015 13:09:52 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.19]:57486) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YHyxy-0002B6-HQ for 19721@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 01 Feb 2015 13:09:51 -0500 Original-Received: from [88.117.59.199] ([88.117.59.199]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx002) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LjqLx-1XgzFt2Koj-00bu87; Sun, 01 Feb 2015 19:09:40 +0100 In-Reply-To: <83a90xiltd.fsf@gnu.org> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:8SUfZku/DU7npGBB0x9AEZ/nzo2VAUZZWgnLDNR1Pg4LOJQEldf gC1baroIK2eHnIgo2ks5IL7yNqNhqEmiaSsckhDoHi1ImYHFONG0sYL+9Z5l3rxT7WxMUyV rff811BotmtjG+zORLongeUpy4/nelgiRbhczjTUOu8MDhaZevJaAtlMr+BhUFWSCcehdGS 8F49fPagtpkAwTt8FUXnw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:98955 Archived-At: >> So you mean that we have to update the mode lines of both - the selected >> and the deselected window? > > Yes, but not because they become selected/deselected, because their > glyph matrices are resized, and the mode-line row gets disabled in the > process. But the glyph matrices are resized _because_ the window gets (de-)selected? In the OP's case, obviously. martin