From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#19661: wrapping before window-width (new wrap-column text property?) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 18:46:34 +0100 Message-ID: <54C52BFA.1080308@gmx.at> References: <83ioh2nlow.fsf@gnu.org> <87sig6xech.fsf@ferrier.me.uk> <83fvc5ni0u.fsf@gnu.org> <87k31fwwyv.fsf@ferrier.me.uk> <87bnmq9ibf.fsf@ferrier.me.uk> <87lhlrx5fc.fsf@building.gnus.org> <878uhrcr5l.fsf@building.gnus.org> <83sifzjflk.fsf@gnu.org> <87egric2ki.fsf_-_@violet.siamics.net> <877fxaa49w.fsf@violet.siamics.net> <831tnicji7.fsf@gnu.org> <83y4pp9dku.fsf@gnu.org> <87387w8r2j.fsf@violet.siamics.net> <87iofxprfv.fsf_-_@violet.siamics.net> <8361bxtr33.fsf@gnu.org> <54C27D19.1080102@gmx.at> <83y4ots0v3.fsf@gnu.org> <54C36111.8030003@gmx.at> <83fvb0se6f.fsf@gnu.org> <54C4C7B2.1080708@gmx.at> <831tmisvtu.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1422208041 28903 80.91.229.3 (25 Jan 2015 17:47:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 17:47:21 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 19661@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 25 18:47:17 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YFRHG-0003Wc-2N for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 18:47:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38467 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YFRHF-0000NJ-Bl for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 12:47:13 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41462) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YFRHB-0000ND-4x for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 12:47:10 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YFRH4-000513-3Q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 12:47:09 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:37477) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YFRH3-00050z-WE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 12:47:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YFRH3-00070a-LO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 12:47:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 17:47:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 19661 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 19661-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B19661.142220800826903 (code B ref 19661); Sun, 25 Jan 2015 17:47:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 19661) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Jan 2015 17:46:48 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56169 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YFRGp-0006zk-Ub for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 12:46:48 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.21]:50966) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YFRGn-0006t9-0Q for 19661@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 12:46:45 -0500 Original-Received: from [93.82.15.78] ([93.82.15.78]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MQih7-1Y7UcY2qi5-00U2A2; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 18:46:35 +0100 In-Reply-To: <831tmisvtu.fsf@gnu.org> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:lyakB4wapHVcuVvvz5g70IjOfOXj1w9fiq7wKyt/cmjUat0x0xr 0x9kB1Yv0X+iuUIzv7aFM2qRb2A3XoBZQ0lxuoRQtIR2aTXxV/sV+yXACsiUw+AR1EVnr5M wpiZAEx5SXyfvRlq0t0koJCuVHRJj/hXlzFy4wRofOE7S9SfZ7uUWcKsUnXKOA06KsPjlbd V0tuwI9sOKoAD8kf/fxQw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:98718 Archived-At: > Sorry for being dense, this being just the first weekday for me, but > what "windows code" does that, please? The one that calculates the text size of windows. Or did you read "Windows code"? > In any case, telling the display engine where to start the display is > a far cry from telling it how to lay out the screen from that point > onwards. My point was to _not_ change the code of the display engine. > Providing an API is not equivalent to implementing it. In order for > us to be able to provide such an API, the display engine should > implement the support such an API will need. And that's the hard part > of the job -- how to perform this layout. Once we figure that out, > providing an API for controlling it will be easy. It essentially would have to subdivide a window into rectangles. And I would do that on the window(s) level to avoid the hard part of the job. martin