From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#19632: 24.4; display-buffer-at-bottom Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 09:02:23 +0100 Message-ID: <54BE0B8F.5020903@gmx.at> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1421741009 22090 80.91.229.3 (20 Jan 2015 08:03:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 08:03:29 +0000 (UTC) To: Leo Liu , 19632@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 20 09:03:16 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YDTmN-0000jT-BP for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 09:03:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41742 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YDTmM-0008Gr-Qg for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 03:03:14 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45705) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YDTmF-0008GV-JD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 03:03:11 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YDTmA-0003hw-C8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 03:03:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:59772) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YDTmA-0003hi-9V for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 03:03:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YDTm9-0007p5-VV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 03:03:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 08:03:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 19632 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 19632-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B19632.142174095730033 (code B ref 19632); Tue, 20 Jan 2015 08:03:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 19632) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Jan 2015 08:02:37 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50231 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YDTll-0007oK-7R for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 03:02:37 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.19]:58515) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YDTli-0007o7-LW for 19632@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 03:02:35 -0500 Original-Received: from [91.113.1.213] ([91.113.1.213]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx002) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LmKOI-1XdrlZ3sRu-00a0rG; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 09:02:28 +0100 In-Reply-To: X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:+7DW5rmENOy3MKdkEPxA4JlSsyvAr1yDMRZMuIxBvIEdjAiPYxn iuAv/amM7FjRVupqiPLakeplfKBqUAqoj3cuPdhOSLzQiSwt8G01MiM8aJRt7MsTUNFE39Q LTGvwke7y4eJOXC+L3v4eb2R0rADE7QLalNto4D1+OOTp/dQtsAxT7e5p6zqE6OJDbAtiXv HYeJ707YcFKckDl5XlOng== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:98492 Archived-At: > Eval the following twice: > > (display-buffer (get-buffer-create "abc") '(display-buffer-at-bottom)) > > Should see two windows showing buffer "abc". Is this a bug or feature? > > My expectation is display-buffer should do nothing if the buffer is > displayed already. It behaves that way in Emacs 25.1. The Emacs 24.5 behavior relies on the caller to explicitly ask for reusing an existing window. martin