From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#19395: 25.0.50; Setting left fringe to 0 messes up window-width Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2014 11:09:18 +0100 Message-ID: <54954ACE.7050204@gmx.at> References: <87vblbnz2u.fsf@posteo.de> <83k31rwe55.fsf@gnu.org> <87lhm772o2.fsf@posteo.de> <83h9wvwbux.fsf@gnu.org> <87bnn39cpe.fsf@posteo.de> <83a92mwau9.fsf@gnu.org> <874msu9out.fsf@posteo.de> <83vblauoh6.fsf@gnu.org> <87wq5q864m.fsf@posteo.de> <83tx0uum88.fsf@gnu.org> <87a92lmxy3.fsf@posteo.de> <837fxpue6v.fsf@gnu.org> <54945BCB.8030506@gmx.at> <83tx0rsa9e.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1419070232 20542 80.91.229.3 (20 Dec 2014 10:10:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2014 10:10:32 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 19395@debbugs.gnu.org, malsburg@posteo.de To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 20 11:10:24 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Y2GzP-0004oq-Jy for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 20 Dec 2014 11:10:23 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33933 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y2GzO-0005Bp-N2 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 20 Dec 2014 05:10:22 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56493) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y2GzD-0005BQ-TZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Dec 2014 05:10:19 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y2Gz6-0004im-4N for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Dec 2014 05:10:11 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:42760) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y2Gz6-0004i5-01 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Dec 2014 05:10:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Y2Gz5-0007rQ-3c for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Dec 2014 05:10:03 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2014 10:10:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 19395 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 19395-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B19395.141907017530158 (code B ref 19395); Sat, 20 Dec 2014 10:10:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 19395) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Dec 2014 10:09:35 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52123 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Y2Gyd-0007qM-2X for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 20 Dec 2014 05:09:35 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.21]:65463) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Y2Gyb-0007qE-2j for 19395@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 20 Dec 2014 05:09:33 -0500 Original-Received: from [178.190.22.249] ([178.190.22.249]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MBaDy-1YAYiS0ZJ0-00AS2e; Sat, 20 Dec 2014 11:09:30 +0100 In-Reply-To: <83tx0rsa9e.fsf@gnu.org> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:fGBaiBztmZlRYAvWavEcqxQNbYNcisD6Fw3k5av31C+mCLA5B+D aToD5kWOxXbJkkHe5OG55UN5ZVDk+4FuxgVrqVqSmtmX5SU5NGKr4Hi/R1rLss1mH9SRomX O57AfHilx11CU2g3As7wFBz5tNEBUqP3XQQd4obXYsIBx4I1PUeXk7kRCANxgsw3yVUk9VT gq92/xJF7idvSDQD8TvJA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:97594 Archived-At: > I don't think the results of font-info depend on that. It's the > result of face-font that depend on the buffer and frame, but once you > have the font's name, all the rest doesn't matter, since Emacs already > have the font data structure set up and stored in memory. Then we should mention the buffer for `face-font'. BTW, why does the Elisp manual say that it does "mostly provide compatibility with old versions of Emacs"? But we also should mention (and I still think `font-info' is the better place for that) what happens when the current buffer has rescaled text but is not displayed on the selected frame (or the frame denoted by the argument of `font-info'). I would do that myself but I got lost in the code. I still don't understand where and how text rescaling is applied. Sorry. martin