From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#19390: 25.0.50; `package-activate' is too slow Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 19:52:18 +0200 Message-ID: <54931452.30000@yandex.ru> References: <86a92oddfp.fsf@yandex.ru> <86mw6nkc6n.fsf@yandex.ru> <54904241.8010000@yandex.ru> <5490BFCD.5050505@yandex.ru> <5490ED6D.5080808@yandex.ru> <868ui5ervl.fsf@yandex.ru> <5492AE61.3040902@yandex.ru> <5492F68C.3090700@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1418925209 28194 80.91.229.3 (18 Dec 2014 17:53:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 17:53:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 19390@debbugs.gnu.org To: bruce.connor.am@gmail.com Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 18 18:53:22 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Y1fGL-00013e-Sp for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 18:53:22 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55140 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y1fGL-0006Rs-AL for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 12:53:21 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51836) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y1fGA-0006RX-Ap for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 12:53:17 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y1fG2-0006b0-4o for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 12:53:10 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:41096) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y1fG2-0006al-1S for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 12:53:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Y1fG1-0005ju-JE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 12:53:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dmitry Gutov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 17:53:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 19390 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 19390-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B19390.141892514322009 (code B ref 19390); Thu, 18 Dec 2014 17:53:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 19390) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Dec 2014 17:52:23 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50462 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Y1fFP-0005iv-56 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 12:52:23 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wg0-f50.google.com ([74.125.82.50]:54562) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Y1fFM-0005im-TB for 19390@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 12:52:21 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-wg0-f50.google.com with SMTP id a1so2304557wgh.37 for <19390@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 09:52:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=7CSY2hDgbGYRCSU/YaI5gMzHQmpS3j3IwcqHQoRLSIk=; b=YD5/NpT672kV5JyEN1z47HPbi2deoFpePTejVmjdxIsfKUVA7FX/GJR/HHKgzOcgLS 2GMErtAWQmQkTjDDLE94QksP6VOU7CVTTxQ6RdI/N/5/vw6bioWSsns+T2g23x9Fc9I0 jLMz9bTi5AP01dn5T8w450oxceGHR0hm6RBOqZnFP1PzBA70AqQ5sl+WXDSq7Un6n9Oc Z1yxKlhHMgkBTrNbxL7HthP0LFIv9DWH1e5lck2cV4wnwtG+hd0uyAoBSsAMxYIHIdKp TLziel1q8dE9OcKGOQJPVGoDgtUdWr1erqHCxS278LN8BYMzr7KAE2FjWDAsIwaw58dB CDVA== X-Received: by 10.180.90.176 with SMTP id bx16mr6002550wib.0.1418925140238; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 09:52:20 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.185] (static-nbl2-118.cytanet.com.cy. [212.31.107.118]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id je12sm10777896wic.22.2014.12.18.09.52.19 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 18 Dec 2014 09:52:19 -0800 (PST) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:97534 Archived-At: On 12/18/2014 07:39 PM, Artur Malabarba wrote: > During package-initialize these things add up, so that's certainly a > lot. But during a regular upgrade, what fraction of the total load time > does that amount to? Even for large packages like helm I think this > percentage should be small. But ^^ The message cuts off here.