From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#19355: 25.0.50; limit the popup window height Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 18:19:19 +0100 Message-ID: <548B2397.7080004@gmx.at> References: <87vblhtz5m.fsf@gmail.com> <548AE36C.7060606@gmx.at> <87lhmd6ms4.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1418404930 27921 80.91.229.3 (12 Dec 2014 17:22:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 17:22:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 19355@debbugs.gnu.org, Juri Linkov To: Leo Liu Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 12 18:22:02 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XzTuj-000196-Di for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 18:22:01 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58687 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XzTui-0008Aj-TL for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 12:22:00 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55837) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XzTsw-0005CD-Ny for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 12:20:18 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XzTsp-0007Do-5O for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 12:20:10 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:34777) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XzTsp-0007DR-1d for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 12:20:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XzTso-0007Xw-C2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 12:20:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 17:20:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 19355 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 19355-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B19355.141840478528979 (code B ref 19355); Fri, 12 Dec 2014 17:20:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 19355) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Dec 2014 17:19:45 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44143 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XzTsW-0007XL-JP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 12:19:44 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.21]:53483) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XzTsU-0007X5-RE for 19355@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 12:19:43 -0500 Original-Received: from [188.22.233.191] ([188.22.233.191]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MbKXI-1YIFkB1kIu-00Im7J; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 18:19:27 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87lhmd6ms4.fsf@gmail.com> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:eBiKUubyHk5odf0k2spChQfwp1Jz+pOaQLiukHLYDm2BHnJ1E3x NEoTzY0/y2k2a3Q2a+2y8wOMQgEKKIH1GY2Uz4eguBo0nYjMFdEsU8H0RY7DnPxUdOqDsQF g5c88/d8ZbTTt8Bhp54HPv5d6SiJk4XPNRGoxiZ0ZJI06SeFGcgvE2OIKnjYhX2CWx0JrXB 9yBZYqMLK4Ft7x4XSp0fQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:97271 Archived-At: >> I'm currently rewriting the code for *Completions* windows to make sure >> they don't get obscured by an expanding minibuffer window. If you have >> a good proposal I can make the necessary changes right away. > > Are we talking about the same thing? I am worrying about *Completions* > buffer and the like obscuring my working buffer. I'm fixing `with-displayed-buffer-window' and `fit-window-to-buffer' for displaying *Completions* from `minibuffer-completion-help'. So if you have a proposal pertinent to the latter tell me so ASAP. In that case I can make a concerted change without having to reexamine code first. martin