From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jan =?UTF-8?Q?Dj=C3=A4rv?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#18757: 24.4; Intermittent screen flicker since upgrading to OS X 10.10 Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2014 19:57:08 +0200 Message-ID: <5443FB74.6020802@swipnet.se> References: <83tx32diy6.fsf@gnu.org> <837fzxe41v.fsf@gnu.org> <059B7168-754B-4DEE-8373-1A84903C47D4@swipnet.se> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1413741509 15754 80.91.229.3 (19 Oct 2014 17:58:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2014 17:58:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 18757@debbugs.gnu.org, Emanuel Evans To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 19 19:58:21 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XfukF-0003rV-DE for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 19 Oct 2014 19:58:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40797 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XfukF-0005ho-4Y for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 19 Oct 2014 13:58:19 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49141) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xfuk5-0005hi-R7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Oct 2014 13:58:17 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xfujy-0004QR-67 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Oct 2014 13:58:09 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:35681) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xfujy-0004QM-2z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Oct 2014 13:58:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Xfujx-0000yc-MO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Oct 2014 13:58:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Jan =?UTF-8?Q?Dj=C3=A4rv?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2014 17:58:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 18757 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 18757-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B18757.14137414363697 (code B ref 18757); Sun, 19 Oct 2014 17:58:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 18757) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Oct 2014 17:57:16 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56012 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XfujE-0000xY-3r for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 19 Oct 2014 13:57:16 -0400 Original-Received: from mailfe04.swip.net ([212.247.154.97]:35472 helo=swip.net) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XfujC-0000xM-Ai for 18757@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 19 Oct 2014 13:57:14 -0400 X-T2-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50 Original-Received: from hosdjarv.se (account mj138573@tele2.se [46.59.42.57] verified) by mailfe04.swip.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.4) with ESMTPA id 539690724; Sun, 19 Oct 2014 19:57:08 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.2 In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:94788 Hi. Den 2014-10-19 19:36, Glenn Morris skrev: > Jan Djärv wrote: > >>> It would be good to hear from other users of 10.10 whether this is a >>> general issue. >> >> I haven't seen it, but have only run 10.10 for a couple of days. > > Would you like the release to wait a few days so this can be > investigated further? If you can give me a day, that would be great. If I haven't come back on this by then, then I think you should do the release. Jan D.