From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ken Brown Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#18699: 25.0.50; Windows 7: Odd length text property list Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2014 15:14:53 -0400 Message-ID: <543C24AD.7090101@cornell.edu> References: <87eguclr91.fsf@telefonica.net> <87a950lob5.fsf_-_@wanadoo.es> <8338as8ri7.fsf@gnu.org> <83wq847az4.fsf@gnu.org> <8761fojiml.fsf@telefonica.net> <83k3446som.fsf@gnu.org> <871tqcjcn6.fsf@wanadoo.es> <83iojn7pqt.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1413227727 17457 80.91.229.3 (13 Oct 2014 19:15:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2014 19:15:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 18699@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii , =?UTF-8?Q?=C3=93scar?= Fuentes Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 13 21:15:19 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Xdl5R-0001J3-LH for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 21:15:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35129 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xdl5R-0002SQ-5R for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 15:15:17 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51000) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xdl5I-0002SJ-ST for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 15:15:14 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xdl5C-00068x-R7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 15:15:08 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:51305) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xdl5C-00068h-OS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 15:15:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Xdl5C-0002t5-Bm for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 15:15:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Ken Brown Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2014 19:15:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 18699 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 18699-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B18699.141322769511070 (code B ref 18699); Mon, 13 Oct 2014 19:15:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 18699) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Oct 2014 19:14:55 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42869 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Xdl54-0002sT-OV for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 15:14:55 -0400 Original-Received: from limerock02.mail.cornell.edu ([128.84.13.242]:60226) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Xdl52-0002sL-CQ for 18699@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 15:14:53 -0400 X-CornellRouted: This message has been Routed already. Original-Received: from authusersmtp.mail.cornell.edu (granite3.serverfarm.cornell.edu [10.16.197.8]) by limerock02.mail.cornell.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4_cu) with ESMTP id s9DJEpAV024626; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 15:14:51 -0400 Original-Received: from [128.84.234.253] (dhcp253.math.cornell.edu [128.84.234.253]) (authenticated bits=0) by authusersmtp.mail.cornell.edu (8.14.4/8.12.10) with ESMTP id s9DJEos3026708 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Mon, 13 Oct 2014 15:14:51 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.2 In-Reply-To: <83iojn7pqt.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:94465 On 10/13/2014 3:07 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: oscarfv@telefonica.net (Óscar Fuentes) >> Cc: 18699-done@debbugs.gnu.org >> Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2014 15:57:17 +0200 >> >>> Perhaps you could ask the MinGW64 developers to change their mind >>> about that. >> >> I could try, but my understanding is that they are not interested on >> doing that, for multiple reasons. One of them is that, in theory, you >> could use the MinGW-w64 compiler with the MinGW headers and libraries. > > That's a nice theory, but I don't think it will hold, since (AFAIU) > the two compilers use different methods of throwing C++ exceptions > between DLLs. > >>> What about __x86_64__, does it perhaps fit the bill already? >> >> __x86_64__ is about the processor. It is also defined by gcc 4.8.2 on my >> Kubuntu x86_64. Of course, being MinGW on x86_64 implies Windows 64. But >> I've seen quite a few patch submissions about ARM support on the >> MinGW-w64 ml, so an hypothetical Emacs compiled for Windows ARM 64bits >> by MinGW would fail the __x86_64__ test. If that Emacs comes to light, >> we probably would need to determine what's the right thing wrt >> ALIGN_STACK, though. >> >> So in this specific case __x86_64__ does not harm, but it is superfluous >> on the presence on _WIN64. > > It is there for Cygwin's sake, Right. And it's *not* about the processor. gcc running under 32-bit Cygwin will not define __x86_64__, regardless of the processor. Ken