From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#18357: 24.3.93; Calendar not fully displayed Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2014 15:51:50 +0200 Message-ID: <5401D6F6.6010109@gmx.at> References: <874mwv40ja.fsf@rosalinde.fritz.box> <83vbpaguyl.fsf@gnu.org> <87a96mqkl3.fsf@rosalinde.fritz.box> <5401C6E7.9070000@gmx.at> <5401C837.9090704@gmx.at> <83sikegla7.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1409406813 22538 80.91.229.3 (30 Aug 2014 13:53:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2014 13:53:33 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 18357@debbugs.gnu.org, stephen.berman@gmx.net To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 30 15:53:25 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XNj5k-00083i-UY for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 30 Aug 2014 15:53:21 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46619 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XNj5k-00042X-Ey for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 30 Aug 2014 09:53:20 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48605) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XNj5Z-00041T-Nt for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Aug 2014 09:53:17 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XNj5S-0004Em-8t for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Aug 2014 09:53:09 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:34311) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XNj5S-0004Eh-64 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Aug 2014 09:53:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XNj5R-0002y3-QJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Aug 2014 09:53:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2014 13:53:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 18357 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 18357-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B18357.140940673511346 (code B ref 18357); Sat, 30 Aug 2014 13:53:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 18357) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Aug 2014 13:52:15 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54108 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XNj4f-0002wv-Oj for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 30 Aug 2014 09:52:14 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]:63705) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XNj4d-0002wh-3q for 18357@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 30 Aug 2014 09:52:12 -0400 Original-Received: from [188.22.33.220] ([188.22.33.220]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MDi9C-1XenJn1ntm-00H7s1; Sat, 30 Aug 2014 15:52:01 +0200 In-Reply-To: <83sikegla7.fsf@gnu.org> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:lDjerOYdM7cWyCmZAhbu0HNRfItotxGJ9SgwrdQxGFhGltF/kl3 PN/RKi0qyHZDu0la9JqzMw/dReREcBM8NgglEZQaypWS09+8Vu93kolMM1JWrLPaDrF6Pou tSb8DrB7nuLRwsEFkXqnk5CDR6s2/vn7GnP6Z9uotXEnVZJv+CNhvQ/+VAzxbMsaL8nCTGu 7oU0lEqC9h4BNKyUVX6+Q== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:92858 Archived-At: > I see no differences between the 2 progn forms you evaluated, so I > cannot really judge whether they correspond to what Stephen reported. You mean the `sit-for' doesn't make a difference for you? I suppose we have to do a redisplay to know the mode-line height when fitting the window in `calendar' but maybe you have a better explanation for this. martin