From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#18181: bug in display-buffer-below-selected Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2014 12:47:02 +0200 Message-ID: <54005A26.9030903@gmx.at> References: <53E65486.6070807@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1409309307 5313 80.91.229.3 (29 Aug 2014 10:48:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2014 10:48:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 18181-done@debbugs.gnu.org To: Trevor Jim Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 29 12:48:21 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XNJjA-0000YT-FZ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 29 Aug 2014 12:48:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41282 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XNJjA-0002gn-59 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 29 Aug 2014 06:48:20 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60171) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XNJiz-0002YR-FH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Aug 2014 06:48:17 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XNJit-0004DL-Df for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Aug 2014 06:48:09 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:33369) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XNJit-0004DB-At for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Aug 2014 06:48:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XNJis-0005Sf-O0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Aug 2014 06:48:02 -0400 Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2014 10:48:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: cc-closed 18181 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: notabug Mail-Followup-To: 18181@debbugs.gnu.org, rudalics@gmx.at, tjim@mac.com Original-Received: via spool by 18181-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D18181.140930924820943 (code D ref 18181); Fri, 29 Aug 2014 10:48:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 18181-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Aug 2014 10:47:28 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53164 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XNJiJ-0005Rj-RZ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 29 Aug 2014 06:47:28 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]:56750) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XNJiG-0005RS-6m for 18181-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 29 Aug 2014 06:47:25 -0400 Original-Received: from [188.22.46.255] ([188.22.46.255]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MZgdm-1Xigso2IbW-00LSJ8; Fri, 29 Aug 2014 12:47:12 +0200 In-Reply-To: <53E65486.6070807@gmx.at> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:upuDu7+CUDj7zagDHyfufXa25BzJSiTeL0HDr3pvID1LH55Sdb6 OMANEUdcOz+Y1YfuCA8b4qCtpYqo0Cap6oflEFlq72JHjJxzaMFaryQBk/amE6rufeREoT5 dcwktyxmT6KIUiAeA0GszhtehqEU6b+B0Vnrpi9YxuqdkewoBWnDDOLXQhHhw5b0jj3wIm6 WCdv0H1r6d5ScCKes18cQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:92803 Archived-At: > > In revision#117435 of the emacs-24 branch I restored the old behavior > > for the case where the buffer already appears below the selected window. > > Maybe the same would be good also for `display-buffer-at-bottom' > to reuse the window already displayed at the bottom? Done. I also now (re-)use the leftmost suitable window at the bottom of the frame. Please have a look. Closing this bug. Thanks, martin PS: I apparently never received this mail here and only incidentally found it now via http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=18181.