From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#18195: 24.3.92; window-screen-lines is not accurate Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2014 16:12:53 +0200 Message-ID: <53E0E665.1000206@gmx.at> References: <86tx5r7l1j.fsf@yandex.ru> <53E097F7.5050407@gmx.at> <53E0ABF9.7070506@yandex.ru> <53E0AF08.50300@gmx.at> <831tsvqc3c.fsf@gnu.org> <53E0E2E5.7050306@gmx.at> <83tx5rowop.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1407248080 15203 80.91.229.3 (5 Aug 2014 14:14:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2014 14:14:40 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 18195@debbugs.gnu.org, dgutov@yandex.ru To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 05 16:14:31 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XEfVO-0003FD-DZ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 05 Aug 2014 16:14:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59680 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XEfVN-0004iI-Vo for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 05 Aug 2014 10:14:21 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42147) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XEfVD-0004b9-Ba for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Aug 2014 10:14:18 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XEfV4-0000eT-EA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Aug 2014 10:14:11 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:51915) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XEfV4-0000eN-AP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Aug 2014 10:14:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XEfV3-0002Hi-JN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Aug 2014 10:14:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2014 14:14:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 18195 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 18195-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B18195.14072479898698 (code B ref 18195); Tue, 05 Aug 2014 14:14:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 18195) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Aug 2014 14:13:09 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58855 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XEfUD-0002GE-3V for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 05 Aug 2014 10:13:09 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.21]:53271) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XEfUB-0002Fx-8i for 18195@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 05 Aug 2014 10:13:07 -0400 Original-Received: from [93.82.13.132] ([93.82.13.132]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Mg0IT-1X2myN3AHd-00NRpO; Tue, 05 Aug 2014 16:12:58 +0200 In-Reply-To: <83tx5rowop.fsf@gnu.org> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:2qEX3n3it8hreRsTasAbTcIFbn4oFfMlym09z2a/y6giC5ti2Ap oeiZRz5w0Hs80K4T1d4T6vaxerldGxZardGtfeG2CxvcFsWgtMXsFmIJ4Z+YOZNmPJzHCO4 kdir45D9f6JYiOZh/ak7EEuGuH3D/xuCSITEvyuOEvZMCvhE3ktNRdk8rEbvtDtgvhdnXsv BEogDd0DTwVsioyHiyI1A== X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:92144 Archived-At: >> It might be a bit clumsy to work with because you have to >> temporarily show another buffer in its window > > That _is_ the problem. Momentarily flashing some text in some window > is not my idea of a good application. It simply looks like a bug. Well, nobody asked for such a feature so far. Can you fix it so it simply works on the current buffer instead of the window's buffer? martin