From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#17788: 24.3; ruler-mode: column indicators "hop" left if you drag them diagonally Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2014 09:11:13 +0200 Message-ID: <539E9891.8020507@gmx.at> References: <84ppiahtix.fsf@gmail.com> <87fvj5omej.fsf@rosalinde.fritz.box> <84zjhdixgw.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1402902754 28147 80.91.229.3 (16 Jun 2014 07:12:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2014 07:12:34 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 17788@debbugs.gnu.org To: Andrea Rossetti , Stephen Berman Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 16 09:12:27 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WwR5e-0003R1-Jx for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 16 Jun 2014 09:12:26 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41899 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WwR5e-0000mI-3s for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 16 Jun 2014 03:12:26 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57477) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WwR5S-0000fB-UA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Jun 2014 03:12:22 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WwR5H-0001IV-RN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Jun 2014 03:12:14 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:57544) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WwR5H-0001IR-O9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Jun 2014 03:12:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WwR5H-0000Q8-9c for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Jun 2014 03:12:03 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2014 07:12:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 17788 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 17788-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B17788.14029026861561 (code B ref 17788); Mon, 16 Jun 2014 07:12:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at 17788) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Jun 2014 07:11:26 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48693 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WwR4g-0000P7-4F for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 Jun 2014 03:11:26 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.19]:60608) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WwR4e-0000On-2q for 17788@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 Jun 2014 03:11:24 -0400 Original-Received: from [88.117.84.120] ([88.117.84.120]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M1BMy-1WcYk221mq-00tCi6; Mon, 16 Jun 2014 09:11:18 +0200 In-Reply-To: <84zjhdixgw.fsf@gmail.com> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:WqHiS6nqMkFSeX8OwuZ7Dn+RR7+9FQGl7pd8WtFFiuK6z4e5r5N 8shkwgylVrq5k9+zRsykvTAFKX6fp1LVpQkUAoeF8/+V6UkpaB1+bAm8iy3otDItoZFUXP+ hDCGT6PAaGLC7kNnFRYEoEl/tcIHfmRadRcFc5sFYFKbO8cYWJo9WJn3vzdhFVOdcb/6W+8 FdWGdDqxPPmoaGUp/2stQ== X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:90424 Archived-At: > I wrote a (quite rough) patch that seems to resolve all "hop" > problems on my installation. May I please ask if anyone has time > and patience to try the patch and report if it provides some benefit. After applying your earlier patch this won't apply any more. Kindly provide a new one against the present trunk. Thanks, martin