From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#17589: 24.3.91; lisp/frameset.el Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 15:09:26 +0200 Message-ID: <53848E86.1010301@gmx.at> References: <53843FF8.6040800@gmx.at> <53845749.1000706@gmx.at> <5384642E.5060000@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1401196757 22555 80.91.229.3 (27 May 2014 13:19:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 13:19:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 17589@debbugs.gnu.org, Arash Cue To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue May 27 15:19:08 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WpHHH-0006gI-MS for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 27 May 2014 15:18:51 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34480 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WpHHH-0003oX-8K for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 27 May 2014 09:18:51 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60569) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WpH8v-0005F9-C9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 27 May 2014 09:10:21 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WpH8l-0005xZ-RP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 27 May 2014 09:10:13 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:34210) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WpH8l-0005uZ-PF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 27 May 2014 09:10:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WpH8k-00032t-LB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 27 May 2014 09:10:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 13:10:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 17589 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 17589-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B17589.140119619211672 (code B ref 17589); Tue, 27 May 2014 13:10:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 17589) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 May 2014 13:09:52 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33084 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WpH8V-000327-Pq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 27 May 2014 09:09:52 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]:55776) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WpH8P-00031o-Dy for 17589@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 27 May 2014 09:09:46 -0400 Original-Received: from [91.113.0.127] ([91.113.0.127]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx002) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MHHZT-1X3Lln2Lat-00E9Du; Tue, 27 May 2014 15:09:32 +0200 In-Reply-To: X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:AR99rbbicVbCdKO+B07KP8fELm3EBEbjvPG229QUh5Iset/uU/b GVkfXc/HvrQ2Stz1n1g5u/axEVckLRy4tSGeZRds4TwolFaOSeZ0BE+3s7USg+IpdIgBqzL jYk/2xCGRYM64mGQnxehkOSb4tnWG/DpAdXCxzwK2nQitaI+zwH1SAvKwNQwDVF3GM5kvJC WMFQ/Mi48qL6pjhtIhEZg== X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:89549 Archived-At: >> If the WRITABLE argument of `window-state-get' is non-nil use the >> buffer name and the buffer object otherwise. > > Oh, I see. Yes, that makes sense. Could you test it? --- lisp/window.el 2014-05-25 10:06:35 +0000 +++ lisp/window.el 2014-05-27 12:57:50 +0000 @@ -4875,7 +4875,7 @@ (let ((point (window-point window)) (start (window-start window))) `((buffer - ,(buffer-name buffer) + ,(if writable (buffer-name buffer) buffer) (selected . ,selected) (hscroll . ,(window-hscroll window)) (fringes . ,(window-fringes window)) martin