From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#17554: 24.3.91; [Regression] re-usage of dired *Marked Files* buffer window Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 09:25:06 +0200 Message-ID: <537EF7D2.1080303@gmx.at> References: <22309.78500.835208.21374@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <831tvlm4f2.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1400829989 8289 80.91.229.3 (23 May 2014 07:26:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 07:26:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 17554@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii , Roland Winkler Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri May 23 09:26:22 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Wnjrx-0005Ds-Qm for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 23 May 2014 09:26:21 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41447 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wnjrx-0003o3-Ep for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 23 May 2014 03:26:21 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52718) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wnjrm-0003nl-Q1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 23 May 2014 03:26:18 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wnjrf-00012D-9o for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 23 May 2014 03:26:10 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:58337) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wnjrf-000126-6m for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 23 May 2014 03:26:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Wnjre-0007lz-5L for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 23 May 2014 03:26:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 07:26:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 17554 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 17554-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B17554.140082993629832 (code B ref 17554); Fri, 23 May 2014 07:26:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 17554) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 May 2014 07:25:36 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57214 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Wnjr9-0007l0-Na for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 23 May 2014 03:25:36 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.21]:60652) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Wnjr6-0007kf-E6 for 17554@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 23 May 2014 03:25:29 -0400 Original-Received: from [93.82.15.238] ([93.82.15.238]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MDR21-1WXSyD21U5-00GsE6; Fri, 23 May 2014 09:25:20 +0200 In-Reply-To: <831tvlm4f2.fsf@gnu.org> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:yxATCb8ysqa4Ocx3XXIVOF8SsmR5BjZ23Og+or77/5eWYQzwgEo qxicIJ8I8onJDeuOx/PXGA16pFzpveDzeN5vVbD0+tP5xk/e++fWMTawMJaUPdZFuqvLXIF LrIVZuUPpTeFN9q1D32ni4KwhguyG+9E/Rr79vzfEY/v4+6NRsBnoi7CwfOvPnniGnfuEyQ wsHbJR0pLH+EoFNSoFlFg== X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:89386 Archived-At: >> I guess, quite generally emacs should make sure that the >> *Completions* buffer uses a "sufficiently large" window to serve its >> purpose. > > Emacs has never done that: if completions are displayed in an existing > window, Emacs would always reuse the size, and not resize it. > > This is not a regression. The behavior is worse in this particular case because we reuse an existing window. So the default behavior has worsened. > If you don't like what you see, I'm sure Martin will be able to tell > you how to customize the window creation such that it suits your > wishes. We should try to improve the default behavior. The points Roland made are valid, unfortunately. martin