From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Paul Eggert Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#41321: 27.0.91; Emacs aborts due to invalid pseudovector objects Date: Wed, 27 May 2020 10:53:22 -0700 Organization: UCLA Computer Science Department Message-ID: <5351703b-1780-561b-7f68-cdd4ed45e599@cs.ucla.edu> References: <83zha8cgpi.fsf@gnu.org> <83r1vibmyj.fsf@gnu.org> <83imgublku.fsf@gnu.org> <831rncjuwf.fsf@gnu.org> <83h7w5xvfa.fsf@gnu.org> <83y2phwb9x.fsf@gnu.org> <83r1v9w9vi.fsf@gnu.org> <83mu5xw50d.fsf@gnu.org> <83k110wxte.fsf@gnu.org> <4bab5f55-95fe-cf34-e490-1d4319728395@cs.ucla.edu> <837dwyvi74.fsf@gnu.org> <1484f569-c260-9fb0-bfe1-67897de289d3@cs.ucla.edu> <83blm9tn4j.fsf@gnu.org> <4aeb8963-4fd1-fcd4-e6e1-be409ab54775@cs.ucla.edu> <83r1v5s2p1.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="107115"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.8.0 Cc: 41321@debbugs.gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, pipcet@gmail.com To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed May 27 19:54:10 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1je0Fl-000Ri1-Ty for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 27 May 2020 19:54:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43348 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1je0Fl-00006q-05 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 27 May 2020 13:54:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41872) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1je0Fe-00006i-BQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 27 May 2020 13:54:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:38406) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1je0Fe-00072E-1r for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 27 May 2020 13:54:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1je0Fe-0000bc-1v for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 27 May 2020 13:54:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Paul Eggert Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 27 May 2020 17:54:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 41321 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 41321-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B41321.15906020122292 (code B ref 41321); Wed, 27 May 2020 17:54:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 41321) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 May 2020 17:53:32 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49952 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1je0F9-0000at-O8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 27 May 2020 13:53:31 -0400 Original-Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([131.179.128.68]:53978) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1je0F7-0000af-Rs for 41321@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 27 May 2020 13:53:30 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C85616004F; Wed, 27 May 2020 10:53:23 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id JcNGJX1-VO3D; Wed, 27 May 2020 10:53:22 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F310160052; Wed, 27 May 2020 10:53:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at zimbra.cs.ucla.edu Original-Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id kcEAYlRj_NBQ; Wed, 27 May 2020 10:53:22 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.9] (cpe-23-242-74-103.socal.res.rr.com [23.242.74.103]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6022A16004F; Wed, 27 May 2020 10:53:22 -0700 (PDT) Autocrypt: addr=eggert@cs.ucla.edu; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= LS0tLS1CRUdJTiBQR1AgUFVCTElDIEtFWSBCTE9DSy0tLS0tCgptUUlOQkV5QWNtUUJFQURB QXlIMnhvVHU3cHBHNUQzYThGTVpFb243NGRDdmM0K3ExWEEySjJ0QnkycHdhVHFmCmhweHhk R0E5Smo1MFVKM1BENGJTVUVnTjh0TFowc2FuNDdsNVhUQUZMaTI0NTZjaVNsNW04c0thSGxH ZHQ5WG0KQUF0bVhxZVpWSVlYL1VGUzk2ZkR6ZjR4aEVtbS95N0xiWUVQUWRVZHh1NDd4QTVL aFRZcDVibHRGM1dZRHoxWQpnZDdneDA3QXV3cDdpdzdlTnZub0RUQWxLQWw4S1lEWnpiRE5D UUdFYnBZM2VmWkl2UGRlSStGV1FONFcra2doCnkrUDZhdTZQcklJaFlyYWV1YTdYRGRiMkxT MWVuM1NzbUUzUWpxZlJxSS9BMnVlOEpNd3N2WGUvV0szOEV6czYKeDc0aVRhcUkzQUZINmls QWhEcXBNbmQvbXNTRVNORnQ3NkRpTzFaS1FNcjlhbVZQa25qZlBtSklTcWRoZ0IxRApsRWR3 MzRzUk9mNlY4bVp3MHhmcVQ2UEtFNDZMY0ZlZnpzMGtiZzRHT1JmOHZqRzJTZjF0azVlVThN Qml5Ti9iClowM2JLTmpOWU1wT0REUVF3dVA4NGtZTGtYMndCeHhNQWhCeHdiRFZadWR6eERa SjFDMlZYdWpDT0pWeHEya2wKakJNOUVUWXVVR3FkNzVBVzJMWHJMdzYrTXVJc0hGQVlBZ1Jy NytLY3dEZ0JBZndoU In-Reply-To: <83r1v5s2p1.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Language: en-US X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:181098 Archived-At: On 5/27/20 10:33 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > Sorry, I don't follow: what do you mean by "losing the address of the > original object" in this case? Can you show an example? The source code says for (i = 0; i < size; i++) foo (AREF (obj, i)); This is the last reference to obj, so the compiler reuses the register R holding obj, and has that register R contain &XVECTOR (obj)->contents[0], &XVECTOR (obj)->contents[1], etc. each time through the loop, and transforms the call into foo (*R) as an optimization. When foo calls the garbage collector, maybe_lisp_pointer (R) can be false because R doesn't point directly at a Lisp object: it points somewhere into the middle of a Lisp object and R's value is not GC-aligned. We've seen compilers do that.